Literature DB >> 20229210

Initial results of MR-guided liver resection in a high-field open MRI.

Sascha Santosh Chopra1, Sven Christian Schmidt, Robert Eisele, Ulf Teichgräber, Ivo Van der Voort, Christian Seebauer, Florian Streitparth, Guido Schumacher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate high-field open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for intraoperative real-time imaging during hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. MR guidance has several advantages compared to ultrasound and may represent a future technique for abdominal surgery. Various MRI-safe and -compatible instruments were developed, tested, and applied to realize minimally invasive liver surgery under MR guidance. As proof of the concept, liver resection was performed in a porcine model.
METHODS: All procedures were conducted in a 1.0-T open MRI unit. Imaging quality and surgical results were documented during three cadaveric and two live animal procedures. A nonferromagnetic hand port was used for manual access and the liver tissue was dissected using a Nd:YAG laser.
RESULTS: The intervention time ranged from 126 to 145 min, with a dissection time from 11 to 15 min. Both live animals survived the intervention with a blood loss of 250 and 170 ml and a specimen weight of 138 and 177 g. A dynamic T2W fast spin-echo sequence allowed real-time imaging (1.5 s/image) with good delineation of major and small hepatic vessels. The newly developed MR-compatible instruments and camera system caused only minor interferences and artifacts of the MR image.
CONCLUSION: MR-guided liver resection is feasible and provides additional image information to the surgeon. We conclude that MR-guided laparoscopic liver resection improves the anatomical orientation and may increase the safety of future minimally invasive liver surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20229210     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0994-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of MR imaging sequences for liver and head and neck interventions: is there a single optimal sequence for all purposes?

Authors:  Daniel T Boll; Jonathan S Lewin; Jeffrey L Duerk; Andrik J Aschoff; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Concepts and preliminary data toward the realization of image-guided liver surgery.

Authors:  David M Cash; Michael I Miga; Sean C Glasgow; Benoit M Dawant; Logan W Clements; Zhujiang Cao; Robert L Galloway; William C Chapman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Feasibility of navigated resection of liver tumors using multiplanar visualization of intraoperative 3-dimensional ultrasound data.

Authors:  Siegfried Beller; Michael Hünerbein; Sebastian Eulenstein; Thomas Lange; Peter M Schlag
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance guidance for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors.

Authors:  Stephan Clasen; Philippe L Pereira
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection with two different Nd:YAG lasers for future use in a high-field open MRI.

Authors:  Sascha Santosh Chopra; Georg Wiltberger; Ulf Teichgraeber; Ioannis Papanikolaou; Michael Schwabe; Sven Schmidt; Panagiotis Fikatas; Florian Streitparth; Carsten Philipp; Florian Wichlas; Christian Seebauer; Guido Schumacher
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Imaging sequences for intraoperative MR-guided laparoscopic liver resection in 1.0-T high field open MRI.

Authors:  S S Chopra; J Rump; S C Schmidt; F Streitparth; C Seebauer; G Schumacher; I Van der Voort; U Teichgräber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Feasibility of stent placement in carotid arteries with real-time MR imaging guidance in pigs.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Charles L Dumoulin; Stephen Dashnaw; Robert D Darrow; Robert L Delapaz; Paul L Bishop; John Pile-Spellman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Laparoscopic parenchymal division of the liver in a porcine model: comparison of the efficacy and safety of three different techniques.

Authors:  U Jersenius; D Fors; S Rubertsson; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A comparison of different techniques for liver resection: blunt dissection, ultrasonic aspirator and jet-cutter.

Authors:  H G Rau; H M Schardey; E Buttler; C Reuter; T U Cohnert; F W Schildberg
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Impact of intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic liver surgery.

Authors:  R Santambrogio; E Opocher; A Pisani Ceretti; M Barabino; M Costa; S Leone; M Montorsi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Intraoperative multidimensional visualization].

Authors:  J Sperling; A Kauffels; M Grade; F Alves; P Kühn; B M Ghadimi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: current role and limitations.

Authors:  Martin Gaillard; Hadrien Tranchart; Ibrahim Dagher
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Identification of liver metastases with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy at two excitation wavelengths.

Authors:  Crispin Schneider; Sean P Johnson; Kurinchi Gurusamy; Richard J Cook; Adrien E Desjardins; David J Hawkes; Brian R Davidson; Simon Walker-Samuel
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.025

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.