| Literature DB >> 18773097 |
Mickael Lesurtel1, Jacques Belghiti.
Abstract
Liver transection is the most challenging part of liver resection due to the risk of massive blood loss which is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as reduced long-term survival after resection of malignancies. Among the devices used for open parenchyma transection, ultrasonic dissection with bipolar cautery forceps is one of the most widely used technique worldwide. We identified four retrospective comparative studies and three randomized controlled trials dealing with the efficacy of ultrasonic dissector (UD) compared with other techniques including the historical clamp crushing technique. UD is associated with similar blood loss and slower resection time compared with water-jet or clamp crushing technique. However, it seems to be more precise in dissecting vessels. Its use does not impact on morbidity and hospital stay compared with other techniques. From an economic point of view, UD is the most expensive technique and may be a disadvantage for low centre volume. UD with bipolar cautery is one of the safest and the most efficient device for liver transection, even if its superiority over the clamp crushing technique has not been well established. It is considered as a standard technique for liver transection.Entities:
Keywords: Liver transection; bipolar coagulation; clamp crushing; ultrasonic dissector
Year: 2008 PMID: 18773097 PMCID: PMC2518292 DOI: 10.1080/13651820802167961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: HPB (Oxford) ISSN: 1365-182X Impact factor: 3.647