Literature DB >> 7718535

Orthognathic surgery: patient expectations; psychological profile and satisfaction with outcome.

P M Finlay1, J M Atkinson, K F Moos.   

Abstract

61 orthognathic surgery patients were studied (39% male, 61% female). It confirms that the group of patients we see in the West of Scotland are well adjusted psychologically and that the majority seek orthognathic surgery for aesthetic reasons. The degree of satisfaction is high (87%). Dissatisfaction is not related to sex, age or procedure. Patients who were dissatisfied tend to have higher neuroticism scores on the Eysenck Personality Inventory and those patients who had had unreal expectations of post surgical pain, numbness and swelling, were likely to express dissatisfaction with the outcome in the early stages. Several patients initially expressed some dissatisfaction with the outcome after 3 months then went on to increase their score and by 12 months became satisfied with the procedure. The authors outline the importance of adequate patient preparation prior to surgery and the use of printed literature is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7718535     DOI: 10.1016/0266-4356(95)90078-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  21 in total

1.  Satisfaction audit of patients undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis with extra-oral distraction appliances.

Authors:  Renu Datta; Ashok Utreja; S P Singh; Vidya Rattan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-12-21

2.  Survey of oral health-related quality of life among skeletal malocclusion patients following orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Angela Schmidt; Robert Ciesielski; Wolfgang Orthuber; Bernd Koos
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Waljee; Evan P McGlinn; Erika Davis Sears; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Temporomandibular joint dysfunction and orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Dujoncquoy; Joël Ferri; Gwénael Raoul; Johannes Kleinheinz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Why simple aesthetic dental treatment in general practice does not make all patients happy.

Authors:  S Sarin; D Gilbert; K Asimakopoulou
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Nikolaos Topouzelis
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-17

7.  Evaluation of Patients' Satisfaction after Class III Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Osvaldo Magro-Filho; Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Derly Tescaro Narcizo Oliveira; Lidia Pimenta Martins; Marcio Salazar; Rodrigo Antonio De Medeiros; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-10-01

8.  The association between the psychological status and the severity of facial deformity in orthognathic patients.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kovalenko; Anna Slabkovskaya; Nailya Drobysheva; Leonid Persin; Alexey Drobyshev; Marcello Maddalone
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Lip morphology changes following orthognathic surgery for Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Rafiqul Islam; Toru Kitahara; Lutfun Naher; Atsushi Hara; Shunsuke Nakata
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness among patients requiring orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Chris Johnston; Orlagh Hunt; Donald Burden; Mike Stevenson; Peter Hepper
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.