Literature DB >> 7714597

Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy.

M J Ebersold1, M C Pare, L M Quast.   

Abstract

The long-term outcome of cervical spondylitic myelopathy after surgical treatment was retrospectively reviewed and critically evaluated in 100 patients with documented cervical myelopathy treated between 1978 and 1988 at our institution. Eighty-four patients were available for long-term study. The median duration of follow up was 7.35 years (range 3 to 9.5 years). There were 67 men and 17 women; their ages ranged from 27 to 86 years. The duration of preoperative symptoms ranged from 1 month to 10 years. Preoperative functional grade as evaluated with the Nurick Scale for the group was 2.1. Thirty-three patients with primarily anterior cord compression, one- or two-level disease, or a kyphotic neck deformity were treated by anterior decompression and fusion. Fifty-one patients with primarily posterior or cord compression and multiple-level disease were treated by posterior laminectomy. There was no difference in the preoperative functional grade in these two groups. The patients in the posterior treatment group were older (59 vs 55 years). There was no surgical mortality from the operative procedures; morbidity was 3.6%. Of the 33 patients undergoing anterior decompression and fusion, 24 showed immediate functional improvement and nine were unchanged. Of the 51 patients who underwent posterior laminectomy, 35 demonstrated improvement, 11 were unchanged, and five were worse. Six patients, one in the anterior group and five in the posterior group, demonstrated early deterioration. Late deterioration occurred from 2 to 68 months postoperatively. Four (12%) patients who had undergone anterior procedures had additional posterior procedures, and seven (13.7%) patients who had undergone posterior procedures had additional decompressive surgery. The final functional status at last follow-up examination for the 33 patients in the anterior group was improved in 18, unchanged in nine, and deteriorated in six. Of the 51 patients who underwent posterior decompression, 19 benefited from the surgery, 13 were unchanged, and 19 were worse at last follow up than before their initial surgical procedure. Age, severity of disease, number of levels operated, and preoperative grade were not predictive of outcome. The only factor related to potential deterioration was the duration of symptoms preoperatively. The results indicate that with anterior or posterior decompression, long-term outcome is variable, and a subgroup of patients, even after adequate decompression and initial improvement, will have late functional deterioration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714597     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1995.82.5.0745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  36 in total

1.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years.

Authors:  Zdeněk Kadaňka; Josef Bednařík; Oldřich Novotný; Igor Urbánek; Ladislav Dušek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Lian; Jian-Guang Xu; Bing-Fang Zeng; Wei Zhou; Wei-Qing Kong; Tie-Sheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy.

Authors:  Sarita van Geest; Anouk M J de Vormer; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not influence surgical results of laminoplasty in elderly cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Yurito Ueda; Toshichika Takeshima; Munehisa Koizumi; Nobuhisa Satoh; Hiroaki Matsumori; Takuya Oshima; Masato Tanaka; Atsuo Kugai; Yoshinori Takakura; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Tract-Specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Before and After Decompressive Spinal Surgery: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  K Y Wang; O Idowu; C B Thompson; G Orman; C Myers; L H Riley; J A Carrino; A Flammang; W Gilson; C L Sadowsky; I Izbudak
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Rehabilitation of incomplete spinal cord pathology: factors affecting prognosis and outcome.

Authors:  V L Stevenson; E D Playford; D W Langdon; A J Thompson
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Cervical spondylosis. An update.

Authors:  B M McCormack; P R Weinstein
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

Review 10.  Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy.

Authors:  Ioannis Nikolaidis; Ioannis P Fouyas; Peter Ag Sandercock; Patrick F Statham
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.