Literature DB >> 20174838

Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study.

Xiao-Feng Lian1, Jian-Guang Xu, Bing-Fang Zeng, Wei Zhou, Wei-Qing Kong, Tie-Sheng Hou.   

Abstract

Anterior decompression and fusion is an established procedure in surgical treatment for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). However, contiguous corpectomies and fusion (CCF) often induce postoperative complications such as nonunion, graft subsidence, and loss of lordotic alignment. As an alternative, noncontiguous corpectomies or one-level corpectomy plus adjacent-level discectomy with retention of an intervening body has been developed recently. In this study, we prospectively compared noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion (NADF) and CCF for MCSM in terms of surgical invasiveness, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications. From January 2005 to June 2007, 105 patients with MCSM were randomized to NADF group (n = 55) and CCF group (n = 50), and followed up for average 31.5 months (range 24-48 months). Average operative time and blood loss decreased significantly in the NADF group as compared with those in the CCF group (p < 0.05 and <0.001, respectively). For VAS, within 3 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups. But at 6 months after surgery and final follow-up, VAS improved significantly in NADF group than that in CCF group (p < 0.05). No significant difference of JOA score was observed between the two groups at every collection time. In NADF group, all 55 cases obtained fusion at 1 year after operation (average 5.1 months). In CCF group, 48 cases achieved fusion 1 year postoperatively, but the other 2 cases were performed posterior stabilization and achieved fusion 6 months later. The differences of cervical lordosis between two groups were insignificant at the same follow-up time. But the loss of lordosis and height of fusion segments in 6 months postoperatively and final follow-up were significantly more in CFF group than in NADF group (p < 0.001). Complications were similar in both groups. But in CCF group three cases needed reoperation, one case with extradural hematoma was immediately re-operated after anterior decompression and two cases mentioned above were performed posterior stabilization at 1 year postoperatively. In conclusion, in the patients with MCSM, without developmental stenosis and continuous or combined ossification of posterior longitudinal ligaments, NADF and CCF showed an identical effect of decompression. In terms of surgical time, blood loss, VAS, fusion rate and cervical alignment, NADF was superior compared with CCF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20174838      PMCID: PMC2899955          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1319-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

1.  Increased rate of arthrodesis with strut grafting after multilevel anterior cervical decompression.

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Mark A Fye; Sanford E Emery; Mark A Palumbo; Henry H Bohlman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Complications of multilevel cervical corpectomies and reconstruction with titanium cages and anterior plating.

Authors:  Hwan T Hee; Mohammad E Majd; Richard T Holt; Thomas S Whitecloud; David Pienkowski
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-02

3.  Fusion rates in multilevel cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients.

Authors:  J C Fernyhough; J I White; H LaRocca
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Subsidence of titanium mesh cage: a study based on 300 cases.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Deyu Chen; Yongfei Guo; Xinwei Wang; Xuhua Lu; Zhiming He; Wen Yuan
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-10

5.  A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy, and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy.

Authors:  H N Herkowitz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Complications of buttress plate stabilization of cervical corpectomy.

Authors:  K D Riew; N S Sethi; J Devney; K Goette; K Choi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Kern Singh; Alexander R Vaccaro; Jesse Kim; Eric P Lorenz; Tae-Hong Lim; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A retrospective study of multiple interbody grafting and long segment strut grafting following multilevel anterior cervical decompression.

Authors:  A P Nirala; M Husain; D K Vatsal
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.596

9.  Graft migration or displacement after multilevel cervical corpectomy and strut grafting.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Wang; Robert A Hart; Sanford E Emery; Henry H Bohlman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Circumferential cervical surgery for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a multianalytic outcome study.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  16 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Min Qi; Huajiang Chen; Lili Yang; Xinwei Wang; Guodong Shi; Rui Gao; Ce Wang; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Long-term follow-up results of the Cloward procedure for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Olimpio Galasso; Massimo Mariconda; Bruno Iannò; Marco De Gori; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Evaluation of anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cages after 1- or 2-level corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study of 117 patients.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Zhengxue Quan; Zenghui Zhao; Xiaoji Luo; Ke Tang; Jie Li; Xu Zhou; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Wen; Jing-Yu Du; Zhi-Heng Ling; Hai-Dong Xu; Xiang-Jin Lin
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Perioperative complications in patients treated with posterior cervical fusion and bilateral cages.

Authors:  Krzysztof B Siemionow; Pawel Glowka; Robert J Blok; Mark C Gillespy; Mukund I Gundanna; William D Smith; Zeshan Hyder; Bruce M McCormack
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

6.  Anterior Cervical Spondylosis Surgical Interventions are Associated with Improved Lordosis and Neurological Outcomes at Latest Follow up: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zengdong Meng; Jing Yu; Chong Luo; Xia Liu; Wei Jiang; Lehua Yu; Rongzhong Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Long-term impacts of different posterior operations on curvature, neurological recovery and axial symptoms for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy.

Authors:  Wei Du; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen; Yingze Zhang; Wenyuan Ding; Longxi Ren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of Functional and Radiological Outcomes Between Two Posterior Approaches in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Da-Jiang Ren; Fang Li; Zhi-Cheng Zhang; Guan Kai; Jian-Lin Shan; Guang-Min Zhao; Tian-Sheng Sun
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 9.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Hui Wang; Sen Liu; Huang-Da An; Huan Liu; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Recommendations for Patients With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disease and Nonmyelopathic Patients With Evidence of Cord Compression.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Lindsay A Tetreault; K Daniel Riew; James W Middleton; Bizhan Aarabi; Paul M Arnold; Darrel S Brodke; Anthony S Burns; Simon Carette; Robert Chen; Kazuhiro Chiba; Joseph R Dettori; Julio C Furlan; James S Harrop; Langston T Holly; Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Mark Kotter; Brian K Kwon; Allan R Martin; James Milligan; Hiroaki Nakashima; Narihito Nagoshi; John Rhee; Anoushka Singh; Andrea C Skelly; Sumeet Sodhi; Jefferson R Wilson; Albert Yee; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.