Literature DB >> 7714274

Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

C W Turner1, P E Souza, L N Forget.   

Abstract

The temporal acuity of listeners with sensorineural hearing loss is currently a matter of some controversy. In this study, the ability of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners to utilize temporal cues of speech was measured directly. In addition to natural (unprocessed) nonsense syllables, several processed-speech conditions were employed. Nonsense syllables were digitally processed to remove the original spectral information, resulting in a time-varying speech envelope amplitude modulating a noise carrier. The processed-speech conditions were the envelope of a broadband speech signal modulating a broadband noise, a low-pass speech signal modulating a low-pass noise, a high-pass speech signal modulating a high-pass noise, and a two-channel signal comprised of the low- and high-pass modulated signals combined. Recognition of the envelope stimuli in quiet and also in modulated and steady noise backgrounds was tested. Listeners were tested at presentation levels yielding their maximum performance on a syllable recognition task. The hearing-impaired listeners performed more poorly on a recognition task than the normal-hearing listeners for unprocessed speech signals. However, for listeners with hearing losses of either flat or sloping configuration, there was no significant deficit in their ability to use temporal cues in speech, even in frequency regions of hearing loss up to 70 dB HL. These results demonstrate that moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss does not impair the temporal (nonspectral) acuity of listeners in terms of speech recognition, when audibility of the stimuli is compensated for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714274     DOI: 10.1121/1.411911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Dynamics of Word Comprehension in Infancy: Developments in Timing, Accuracy, and Resistance to Acoustic Degradation.

Authors:  Renate Zangl; Lindsay Klarman; Donna Thal; Anne Fernald; Elizabeth Bates
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2005

2.  Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Bomjun J Kwon; Trevor T Perry; Cassie L Wilhelm; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

4.  Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Jeon; Christopher W Turner; Sue A Karsten; Belinda A Henry; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparing the information conveyed by envelope modulation for speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

Review 7.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

8.  Effects of electrode separation between speech and noise signals on consonant identification in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Aged-related loss of temporal processing: altered responses to amplitude modulated tones in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  T A Schatteman; L F Hughes; D M Caspary
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.