Literature DB >> 7714259

Interspike intervals as a correlate of periodicity pitch in cat cochlear nucleus.

W S Rhode1.   

Abstract

Amplitude modulated (AM) signals have often been used as precisely defined partial analogs of speech sounds. This study considers the response to an AM complex with 200% sinusoidal modulation, that is, the amplitudes of the three AM components are equal. By varying the carrier frequency across the entire frequency range of unit response, it is shown that units in the cochlear nucleus of cat are relatively insensitive to variation in the carrier frequency, which is to say that population response to an AM signal at a fixed locus will be widespread. These stimuli and procedures result in the presentation of both harmonic and inharmonic complexes, and thus permit assessment of neural responses for the information needed to make spectral or time-domain pitch matches. It is shown that the reciprocals of the modes (favored intervals) in the interspike interval histogram reflect the first effect of pitch shift, which is defined psychophysically as a proportional shift in pitch to the change in carrier frequency. In particular, interspike intervals of units with a widespread spectral response provide a basis to explain phase and dominant component pitch behavior that early narrow-band pitch theories found problematical. The amplitude of phase locking to individual AM components varies systematically though there are some unexplained variations across the frequency-intensity plane that could be due to combination tones. The unit response to a quasifrequency modulated (QFM) stimulus shows that if pitch is based on interspike intervals, it would remain the smae as pitch for an AM signal. The magnitude of the synchrony response to QFM stimuli is less than to AM stimuli for the majority of cochlear nucleus units; however, there are exceptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714259     DOI: 10.1121/1.411963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea-pig.

Authors:  I M Winter; L Wiegrebe; R D Patterson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Spatiotemporal representation of the pitch of harmonic complex tones in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Pitch of complex tones: rate-place and interspike interval representations in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spectral and temporal modulation tradeoff in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Francisco A Rodríguez; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Distinct roles for onset and sustained activity in the neuronal code for temporal periodicity and acoustic envelope shape.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pitch representations in the auditory nerve: two concurrent complex tones.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Pitch of harmonic complex tones: rate and temporal coding of envelope repetition rate in inferior colliculus of unanesthetized rabbits.

Authors:  Yaqing Su; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing musically relevant pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.