PURPOSE: To quantify optical and biomechanical properties of the feline cornea before and after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and assess the relative contribution of different biological factors to refractive outcome. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA. METHODS: Adult cats had 6.0 diopter (D) myopic or 4.0 D hyperopic PRK over 6.0 or 8.0 mm optical zones (OZ). Preoperative and postoperative wavefront aberrations were measured, as were intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal hysteresis, the corneal resistance factor, axial length, corneal thickness, and radii of curvature. Finally, postmortem immunohistochemistry for vimentin and alpha-smooth muscle actin was performed. RESULTS: Photorefractive keratectomy changed ocular defocus, increased higher-order aberrations, and induced myofibroblast differentiation in cats. However, the intended defocus corrections were only achieved with 8.0 mm OZs. Long-term flattening of the epithelial and stromal surfaces was noted after myopic, but not after hyperopic, PRK. The IOP was unaltered by PRK; however, corneal hysteresis and the corneal resistance factor decreased. Over the ensuing 6 months, ocular aberrations and the IOP remained stable, while central corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis, and the corneal resistance factor increased toward normal levels. CONCLUSIONS: Cat corneas exhibited optical, histological, and biomechanical reactions to PRK that resembled those previously described in humans, especially when the OZ size was normalized to the total corneal area. However, cats exhibited significant stromal regeneration, causing a return to preoperative corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis and the corneal resistance factor without significant regression of optical changes induced by the surgery. Thus, the principal effects of laser refractive surgery on ocular wavefront aberrations can be achieved despite clear interspecies differences in corneal biology.
PURPOSE: To quantify optical and biomechanical properties of the feline cornea before and after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and assess the relative contribution of different biological factors to refractive outcome. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA. METHODS: Adult cats had 6.0 diopter (D) myopic or 4.0 D hyperopic PRK over 6.0 or 8.0 mm optical zones (OZ). Preoperative and postoperative wavefront aberrations were measured, as were intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal hysteresis, the corneal resistance factor, axial length, corneal thickness, and radii of curvature. Finally, postmortem immunohistochemistry for vimentin and alpha-smooth muscle actin was performed. RESULTS: Photorefractive keratectomy changed ocular defocus, increased higher-order aberrations, and induced myofibroblast differentiation in cats. However, the intended defocus corrections were only achieved with 8.0 mm OZs. Long-term flattening of the epithelial and stromal surfaces was noted after myopic, but not after hyperopic, PRK. The IOP was unaltered by PRK; however, corneal hysteresis and the corneal resistance factor decreased. Over the ensuing 6 months, ocular aberrations and the IOP remained stable, while central corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis, and the corneal resistance factor increased toward normal levels. CONCLUSIONS: Cat corneas exhibited optical, histological, and biomechanical reactions to PRK that resembled those previously described in humans, especially when the OZ size was normalized to the total corneal area. However, cats exhibited significant stromal regeneration, causing a return to preoperative corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis and the corneal resistance factor without significant regression of optical changes induced by the surgery. Thus, the principal effects of laser refractive surgery on ocular wavefront aberrations can be achieved despite clear interspecies differences in corneal biology.
Authors: Birgit Lackner; Gerald Schmidinger; Stefan Pieh; Martin A Funovics; Christian Skorpik Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Ana C Acosta; Edgar M Espana; Josef Stoiber; Peggy D Lamar; Fabiana Marangon; Eduardo Alfonso; Jean Marie Parel Journal: Cornea Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: David P S O'Brart; Elizabeth Patsoura; Philip Jaycock; Madavan Rajan; John Marshall Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Jason Porter; Geunyoung Yoon; Diana Lozano; Jessica Wolfing; Remy Tumbar; Scott Macrae; Ian G Cox; David R Williams Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Daniel E Savage; Daniel R Brooks; Margaret DeMagistris; Lisen Xu; Scott MacRae; Jonathan D Ellis; Wayne H Knox; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mary Ann Stepp; James D Zieske; Vickery Trinkaus-Randall; Briana M Kyne; Sonali Pal-Ghosh; Gauri Tadvalkar; Ahdeah Pajoohesh-Ganji Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Kaitlin T Wozniak; Sara M Gearhart; Daniel E Savage; Jonathan D Ellis; Wayne H Knox; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Jens Bühren; Lana Nagy; Jennifer N Swanton; Shawn Kenner; Scott MacRae; Richard P Phipps; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-10-24 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Holly B Hindman; Jennifer N Swanton; Richard P Phipps; Patricia J Sime; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kye-Im Jeon; Ajit Kulkarni; Collynn F Woeller; Richard P Phipps; Patricia J Sime; Holly B Hindman; Krystel R Huxlin Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 4.307