Literature DB >> 12730769

Design and methodology of the phase 3 trials for the clinical development of strontium ranelate in the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

P J Meunier1, J Y Reginster.   

Abstract

The phase 3 program for strontium ranelate, a new oral agent in the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, was aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the daily oral dose of 2 g. This program was conducted in 12 countries, involved 75 centers, and was structured in 3 studies: FIRST (Fracture International Run-in for Strontium ranelate Trial), SOTI (Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention study) and TROPOS (TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis). FIRST, a run-in open study, was designed to start the normalization of the calcium and vitamin D status of the patients, check all entry criteria, and ensure inclusion of a sufficient number of well-motivated patients in either one of the two therapeutic intervention protocols, SOTI or TROPOS: FIRST included 9,196 patients. SOTI and TROPOS were prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing, in two parallel groups, the daily oral dose of 2 g of strontium ranelate with placebo, the patients of both groups receiving calcium and vitamin D according to their own deficiencies. The main objective of SOTI and TROPOS was to demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of postmenopausal women experiencing a new osteoporotic fracture (vertebral fracture in SOTI and nonvertebral fracture in TROPOS) over a 3-year treatment period, the total duration of the studies being 5 years. SOTI included 1,649 women with at least one osteoporotic vertebral fracture at inclusion and a lumbar BMD </=0.840 g/cm(2). TROPOS included 5,091 women with a femoral neck BMD </=0.600 g/cm(2). The phase 3 program for the clinical development of strontium ranelate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is a long-term program with the main statistical analysis after 3 years of treatment. Its aim is to demonstrate the effect of strontium ranelate on the axial and appendicular skeleton as well as its tolerability in osteoporotic patients with replete calcium and vitamin D stores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12730769     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-002-1341-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

Review 1.  Who has osteoporosis? A conflict between clinical and public health perspectives.

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential of strontium in bone.

Authors:  P J Marie; P Ammann; G Boivin; C Rey
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Development and validation of a specific quality of life module in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis: the QUALIOST.

Authors:  P Marquis; P Cialdella; C De la Loge
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Design of the Fracture Intervention Trial.

Authors:  D M Black; T F Reiss; M C Nevitt; J Cauley; D Karpf; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Adami; S Ortolani; R Wasnich
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Bone mass measurements and risk of fracture in Caucasian women: a review of findings from prospective studies.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 8.  Why elderly women should be screened and treated to prevent osteoporosis.

Authors:  D M Black
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Changes in incidence and prevalence of vertebral fractures during 30 years.

Authors:  U Bengnér; O Johnell; I Redlund-Johnell
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 10.  Esophagitis associated with the use of alendronate.

Authors:  P C de Groen; D F Lubbe; L J Hirsch; A Daifotis; W Stephenson; D Freedholm; S Pryor-Tillotson; M J Seleznick; H Pinkas; K K Wang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  10 in total

1.  Structural studies of human alkaline phosphatase in complex with strontium: implication for its secondary effect in bones.

Authors:  Paola Llinas; Michel Masella; Torgny Stigbrand; André Ménez; Enrico A Stura; Marie Hélène Le Du
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Addressing the age-related needs of osteoporotic patients with strontium ranelate.

Authors:  S Boonen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Estimation of direct unit costs associated with non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures in five European countries.

Authors:  S Bouee; A Lafuma; F Fagnani; P J Meunier; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 4.  Clinical effects of strontium ranelate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Strontium ranelate: new data on fracture prevention and mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Reginster; Rita Deroisy; Audrey Neuprez; Mickaël Hiligsmann; Brigitte Zegels; Olivier Bruyere
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Strontium ranelate for preventing and treating postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  S O'Donnell; A Cranney; G A Wells; J D Adachi; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 7.  A comparison of adverse event and fracture efficacy data for strontium ranelate in regulatory documents and the publication record.

Authors:  Mark J Bolland; Andrew Grey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Effects of long-term strontium ranelate treatment on vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  P J Meunier; C Roux; S Ortolani; M Diaz-Curiel; J Compston; P Marquis; C Cormier; G Isaia; J Badurski; J D Wark; J Collette; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Vertebral anti-fracture efficacy of strontium ranelate according to pre-treatment bone turnover.

Authors:  J Collette; O Bruyère; J M Kaufman; R Lorenc; D Felsenberg; T D Spector; M Diaz-Curiel; S Boonen; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  A review of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nancy E Lane; Ariella Kelman
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 5.156

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.