Literature DB >> 7709247

Magnetization transfer contrast MRI of musculoskeletal neoplasms.

K C Li1, K L Hopkins, S G Moore, N N Loh, G Bergman, G B Pike, G H Glover.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed in 15 patients with musculoskeletal neoplasms to assess the value of magnetization transfer contrast in tumor characterization. Multiplanar gradient-recalled echo sequences (TR 500-600/TE 15-20/flip angle 20-30 degrees) were performed first without and then with magnetization transfer contrast generated by a zero degree binomial pulse (MPGR and MTMPGR). Standard T1-weighted spin echo images (SE; TR 300-400/TE 12-20) and either T2-weighted SE (TR 2000-2900/TE 70-80) or T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE; TR 4000-5000/TE 100-119 effective) images were also obtained. Signal intensities on MTMPGR scans were compared to those on MPGR scans for both tumors and normal tissues. Signal intensity ratios (SIR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were also compared for all sequences. MTMPGR images provided better contrast between pathologic tissues and muscle than did standard MPGR images, increasing both conspicuity of lesions and definition of tumor/muscle interfaces. Benign and malignant tumors, with the exception of lipoma, underwent similar degrees of magnetization transfer and could not be distinguished by this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7709247     DOI: 10.1007/bf02425940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  12 in total

1.  Pulsed saturation transfer contrast.

Authors:  B S Hu; S M Conolly; G A Wright; D G Nishimura; A Macovski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Magnetization transfer contrast: method for improving contrast in gradient-recalled-echo images.

Authors:  S D Wolff; J Eng; R S Balaban
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Tissue specificity of low-field-strength magnetization transfer contrast imaging.

Authors:  P T Niemi; M E Komu; S K Koskinen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Pulsed magnetization transfer versus continuous wave irradiation for tissue contrast enhancement.

Authors:  E Schneider; R W Prost; G H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Magnetization transfer effects in multislice MR imaging.

Authors:  G E Santyr
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Quantitative interpretation of magnetization transfer.

Authors:  R M Henkelman; X Huang; Q S Xiang; G J Stanisz; S D Swanson; M J Bronskill
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Pulsed magnetization transfer spin-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  G B Pike; G H Glover; B S Hu; D R Enzmann
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo.

Authors:  S D Wolff; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Magnetization transfer of hepatic lesions: evaluation of a novel contrast technique in the abdomen.

Authors:  E Outwater; M D Schnall; L E Braitman; B J Dinsmore; H Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Experimental hepatic tumor necrosis. Comparison of spin-echo and pulsed magnetization transfer contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  K C Li; R B Jeffrey; S C Ning; A Kandil; G M Hahn; B Pike; G Glover; J Kosek
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  1 in total

1.  Applications of magnetization transfer contrast in the musculoskeletal system in children.

Authors:  M Haliloglu; M D Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.