Literature DB >> 7707009

Lung cancer: is there an association with socioeconomic status in The Netherlands?

A J van Loon1, R A Goldbohm, P A van den Brandt.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if there are differences in lung cancer incidence between socioeconomic groups in the Netherlands and if so, if smoking habits and other lifestyle characteristics could explain these differences.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. Baseline measurement included information on socioeconomic status, smoking habits, and other covariates by means of a self-administered questionnaire. Follow up was established by computerised record linkage to cancer registries and a pathology register.
SETTING: Population originating from 204 municipalities in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 58,279 men aged 55-69 years in September 1986. After 3.3 years of follow up 490 microscopically confirmed incident lung cancer cases were detected. MAIN
RESULTS: An inverse association between lung cancer risk and highest level of education was found, which persisted after adjustment for age, smoking, dietary intake of vitamin C, beta-carotene and retinol (rate ratio (RR) highest/lowest level of education = 0.52, 95% CI 0.33, 0.82, trend p < 0.001). Men with a lower white collar profession had a significantly lower relative rate of lung cancer compared with blue collar workers (RR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.47, 0.96), but after adjustment for smoking habits this difference was reduced (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.51, 1.08).
CONCLUSIONS: There is an inverse association between highest level of education and lung cancer, which is still apparent after adjustment for age, smoking, dietary intake of vitamin C, beta-carotene and retinol. The significantly lower lung cancer risk of lower white collar workers compared with the risk of blue collar workers could be partially explained by smoking habits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7707009      PMCID: PMC1060077          DOI: 10.1136/jech.49.1.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  24 in total

1.  Smoking patterns by occupation, industry, sex, and race.

Authors:  T D Sterling; J J Weinkam
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec

2.  Cancer incidence by living area, social class and occupation.

Authors:  L Teppo
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Proportion of lung cancers due to occupational exposure.

Authors:  U Pastorino; F Berrino; A Gervasio; V Pesenti; E Riboli; P Crosignani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1984-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Occupation, social class and male cancer mortality in New Zealand, 1974-78.

Authors:  N E Pearce; J K Howard
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Diet and lung cancer risk: findings from the Western New York Diet Study.

Authors:  T E Byers; S Graham; B P Haughey; J R Marshall; M K Swanson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Occurrence of cancer in socioeconomic groups in Sweden. An analysis based on the Swedish Cancer Environment Registry.

Authors:  D Vågerö; G Persson
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1986

7.  Epidemiology of retinoids and cancer.

Authors:  S Graham
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Dietary habits and lung cancer risk.

Authors:  G Kvåle; E Bjelke; J J Gart
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1983-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Comparative epidemiology of tobacco-related cancers.

Authors:  E L Wynder; S D Stellman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Association of cancer sites with tobacco and alcohol consumption and socioeconomic status of patients: interview study from the Third National Cancer Survey.

Authors:  R R Williams; J W Horm
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  14 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and lung cancer incidence in men in The Netherlands: is there a role for occupational exposure?

Authors:  A J van Loon; R A Goldbohm; I J Kant; G M Swaen; A M Kremer; P A van den Brandt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the 1900s relating smoking to lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter N Lee; Barbara A Forey; Katharine J Coombs
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Occupational class and cause specific mortality in middle aged men in 11 European countries: comparison of population based studies. EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health.

Authors:  A E Kunst; F Groenhof; J P Mackenbach; E W Health
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-30

Review 4.  The epidemiology of lung cancer: review of risk factors and Spanish data.

Authors:  B Takkouche; J J Gestal-Otero
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 5.  Use of cancer incidence data in identification of cancer causation.

Authors:  E Lynge
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Long-term use of supplemental multivitamins, vitamin C, vitamin E, and folate does not reduce the risk of lung cancer.

Authors:  Christopher G Slatore; Alyson J Littman; David H Au; Jessie A Satia; Emily White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Occupational exposures contribute to educational inequalities in lung cancer incidence among men: Evidence from the EPIC prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gwenn Menvielle; Hendriek Boshuizen; Anton E Kunst; Paolo Vineis; Susanne O Dalton; Manuela M Bergmann; Silke Hermann; Fabrizio Veglia; Pietro Ferrari; Kim Overvad; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Anne Tjønneland; Rudolf Kaaks; Jakob Linseisen; Domenico Palli; Vittorio Krogh; Rosario Tumino; Laudina Rodriguez; Antonio Agudo; Maria-José Sánchez; Jone Miren Altzibar Arozena; Lluis Cirera; Eva Ardanaz; Sheila Bingham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paolo Boffetta; Eric Duell; Nadia Slimani; Valentina Gallo; Elio Riboli; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Lung cancer, smoking, and environment: a cohort study of the Danish population.

Authors:  G Engholm; F Palmgren; E Lynge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

9.  Socioeconomic status and lung cancer: unraveling the contribution of genetic admixture.

Authors:  Melinda C Aldrich; Steve Selvin; Margaret R Wrensch; Jennette D Sison; Helen M Hansen; Charles P Quesenberry; Michael F Seldin; Lisa F Barcellos; Patricia A Buffler; John K Wiencke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The role of smoking and diet in explaining educational inequalities in lung cancer incidence.

Authors:  Gwenn Menvielle; Hendriek Boshuizen; Anton E Kunst; Susanne O Dalton; Paolo Vineis; Manuela M Bergmann; Silke Hermann; Pietro Ferrari; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Anne Tjønneland; Rudolf Kaaks; Jakob Linseisen; Maria Kosti; Antonia Trichopoulou; Vardis Dilis; Domenico Palli; Vittorio Krogh; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Frederike L Büchner; Carla H van Gils; Petra H M Peeters; Tonje Braaten; Inger T Gram; Eiliv Lund; Laudina Rodriguez; Antonio Agudo; Maria-José Sánchez; Maria-José Tormo; Eva Ardanaz; Jonas Manjer; Elisabet Wirfält; Göran Hallmans; Torgny Rasmuson; Sheila Bingham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Naomi Allen; Tim Key; Paolo Boffetta; Eric J Duell; Nadia Slimani; Valentina Gallo; Elio Riboli; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.