Literature DB >> 7703626

Do Australian women have greater spinal bone density than North American women?

L Flicker1, R Green, B Kaymakci, M Lichtenstein, G Buirski, J D Wark.   

Abstract

The interpretation of bone mineral densitometry results for a particular individual relies on valid reference data from a representative population sample. To establish local reference data, 411 Australian female volunteers had bone mineral densitometry performed at a single medical centre at the proximal femur and lumbar spine using a Hologic QDR 1000-W dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer. These data were compared with reference material from North American women compiled by Hologic. The Australian volunteers had, on average, 7% greater bone mineral density at the lumbar spine for the age range 25-55 years. Possible explanations for this include an actual population difference or the presence of a differential selection bias between the two samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7703626     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  4 in total

1.  Bone mineral density in Australia compared with the United States.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; R B Mazess; P N Sambrook; M G Yeates; J Freund
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S R Cummings; J L Kelsey; M C Nevitt; K J O'Dowd
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Bone mineral density of the hip measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal elderly women and in patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; P Braillon; M C Chapuy; P Haond; C Hardouin; M F Meary; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; D A Schoenfeld; R M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.958

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Bone mineral density reference ranges for Australian men: Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  M J Henry; J A Pasco; S Korn; J E Gibson; M A Kotowicz; G C Nicholson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone mineral density & T-scores.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Nandrolone decanoate and intranasal calcitonin as therapy in established osteoporosis.

Authors:  L Flicker; J L Hopper; R G Larkins; M Lichtenstein; G Buirski; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Age-related changes in bone density among healthy Greek males.

Authors:  G E Krassas; F G Papadopoulou; D Doukidis; T H Konstantinidis; K Kalothetou
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Self-reported ballet classes undertaken at age 10-12 years and hip bone mineral density in later life.

Authors:  K M Khan; K L Bennell; J L Hopper; L Flicker; C A Nowson; A J Sherwin; K J Crichton; P R Harcourt; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.071

6.  Significant differences in UK and US female bone density reference ranges.

Authors:  E Noon; S Singh; J Cuzick; T D Spector; F M K Williams; M L Frost; A Howell; M Harvie; R Eastell; R E Coleman; I Fogelman; G M Blake
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.