Literature DB >> 16545295

[Validity of digital rectal examination in the era of prostate specific antigen].

E Alonso-Sandoica1, J Jara-Rascón, J I Martínez-Salamanca, C Hernández-Fernández.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the presence of a possible correlation between prostate specific antigen (PSA) and the findings from digital rectal examination (DRE) in patients with prostate cancer or benign prostatic hyperplasia.
DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal, and observational study of diagnostic tests.
SETTING: Gregorio Marañón Hospital, Madrid, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: It included 706 patients with a PSA in the range 4.1-20 ng/mL, studied owing to suspected prostate cancer localised using DRE and transrectal ultrasound, in whom randomised prostate biopsies were performed. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Total PSA and free/total PSA ratio and DRE normal or suspicious were studied as main variables. The outcome variable was the diagnosis of prostatic cancer by biopsy.
RESULTS: With a detection of cancer of 28.2%, there were no statistically significant differences in the PSA or free/total PSA ratio mean values between patients with or without suspicious DRE. The analysis using ROC curves (with a 95% confidence interval) between both groups of patients found the same sensitivity of 95% with a similar specificity of 6% and 10%, respectively, for a PSA of 4.8 ng/mL.
CONCLUSIONS: In the PSA range of 4.1-20 ng/mL, the findings of DRE appeared as a variable unrelated to the increase in PSA or the free/total PSA ratio and, therefore are not indicative of a lesser or greater volume of a tumour producing PSA. The performing of this examination could be considered as optional.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16545295      PMCID: PMC8149142          DOI: 10.1157/13083938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


  20 in total

1.  Modalities available for screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  F M Bentvelsen; F H Schröder
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Practice patterns among primary care physicians in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Fawzy; C Fontenot; R Guthrie; M M Baudier
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Characteristics of screening detected prostate cancer in men 50 to 66 years old with 3 to 4 ng./ml. Prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  P Lodding; G Aus; S Bergdahl; R Frösing; H Lilja; C G Pihl; J Hugosson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Diagnostic testing for prostate cancer detection: less is best.

Authors:  R J Babaian; C P Dinney; E I Ramirez; R B Evans
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Early detection of prostate cancer. Serendipity strikes again.

Authors:  M McNaughton Collins; D F Ransohoff; M J Barry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-11-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The use of prostate specific antigen density to enhance the predictive value of intermediate levels of serum prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  M C Benson; I S Whang; C A Olsson; D J McMahon; W H Cooner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The prostate specific antigen era in the United States is over for prostate cancer: what happened in the last 20 years?

Authors:  Thomas A Stamey; Mitchell Caldwell; John E McNeal; Rosalie Nolley; Marci Hemenez; Joshua Downs
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P H Gann; C H Hennekens; M J Stampfer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.