Literature DB >> 7677458

Outcome analysis of 71 clinical intestinal transplantations.

S Todo1, J Reyes, H Furukawa, K Abu-Elmagd, R G Lee, A Tzakis, A S Rao, T E Starzl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine risk factors associated with graft failure and mortality after transplantation of the intestine alone or as part of an organ complex. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Even with modern immunosuppressive therapies, clinical intestinal transplantation remains a difficult and unreliable procedure. Causes for this and solutions are needed.
METHODS: Between May 1990 and February 1995, 71 intestinal transplantations were performed in 66 patients using tacrolimus and low-dose steroids. The first 63 patients, all but one treated 1 to 5 years ago, received either isolated grafts (n = 22), liver and intestinal grafts (n = 30), or multivisceral grafts (n = 11). Three more recipients of allografts who recently underwent surgery and one undergoing retransplantation were given unaltered donor bone marrow cells perioperatively as a biologic adjuvant.
RESULTS: Of the first 63 recipients, 32 are alive: 28 have functioning primary grafts and 4 have resumed total parenteral nutrition after graft enterectomy. Thirty-five primary grafts were lost to technical and management errors (n = 10), rejection (n = 6), and infection (n = 19). Regression analysis revealed that duration of surgery, positive donor cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology, inclusion of graft colon, OKT3 use, steroid recycle, and high tacrolimus blood levels contributed to graft loss. All four intestine and bone marrow recipients are alive for 2-3 months without evidence of graft-versus-host disease.
CONCLUSION: To improve outcome after intestinal transplantation with previous management protocols, it will be necessary to avoid predictably difficult patients, CMV seropositive donors, and inclusion of the graft colon. Bone marrow transplantation may further improve outcome by ameliorating the biologic barriers of rejection and infection and allowing less restrictive selection criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7677458      PMCID: PMC1234805          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  64 in total

1.  Homotransplantation of multiple visceral organs.

Authors:  T E STARZL; H A KAUPP; D R BROCK; G W BUTZ; J W LINMAN
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1962-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Transplantation of multiple abdominal viscera.

Authors:  T E Starzl; M I Rowe; S Todo; R Jaffe; A Tzakis; A L Hoffman; C Esquivel; K A Porter; R Venkataramanan; L Makowka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Endogenous endotoxemia during orthotopic liver transplantation in dogs.

Authors:  T Miyata; S Todo; O Imventarza; Y Ueda; H Furukawa; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Abdominal organ cluster transplantation for the treatment of upper abdominal malignancies.

Authors:  T E Starzl; S Todo; A Tzakis; L Podesta; L Mieles; A Demetris; L Teperman; R Selby; W Stevenson; A Stieber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Canine small bowel transplantation. A study of the immunological responses.

Authors:  Z Cohen; A B MacGregor; K T Moore; R E Falk; B Langer; J B Cullen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1976-03

6.  Splanchnic transplantation. An approach to the infant dependent on parenteral nutrition who develops irreversible liver disease.

Authors:  J W Williams; H N Sankary; P F Foster; J M Loew; G M Goldman; J Lowe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Intestinal transplantation in composite visceral grafts or alone.

Authors:  S Todo; A G Tzakis; K Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; K Nakamura; A Casavilla; R Selby; B M Nour; H Wright; J J Fung
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Prevention of graft-versus-host disease following small bowel transplantation with polyclonal and monoclonal antilymphocyte serum. The effect of timing and route of administration.

Authors:  D Shaffer; C S Ubhi; M A Simpson; R Gottschalk; E L Milford; T Maki; A P Monaco
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Allografts surviving for 26 to 29 years following living-related kidney transplantation: analysis by light microscopy, in situ hybridization for the Y chromosome, and anti-HLA antibodies.

Authors:  P S Randhawa; T Starzl; H C Ramos; M A Nalesnik; J Demetris
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Studies in small bowel transplantation. Prevention of graft-versus-host disease with preservation of allograft function by donor pretreatment with antilymphocyte serum.

Authors:  D Shaffer; T Maki; S J DeMichele; M D Karlstad; B R Bistrian; K Balogh; A P Monaco
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  59 in total

1.  The birth of clinical organ transplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Hepatic and intestinal transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh.

Authors:  K Abu-Elmagd; J Fung; J Reyes; A Rao; A Jain; G Mazariegos; W Marsh; J Madariaga; I Dvorchik; J Bueno; J Rogers; J McMichael; F Dodson; H Vargus; J Martin; A Slivka; V Balan; R Corry; J Rakela; N Murase; J Demetris; S Iwatsuki; T Starzl
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  1998

3.  Clinical intestinal transplantation in 1998: Pittsburgh experience.

Authors:  K M Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; J J Fung; G Mazariegos; J Bueno; D Martin; J Colangelo; A Rao; A Demetris; T E Starzl
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Evolution of clinical intestinal transplantation: improved outcome and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  K M Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; J J Fung; G Mazariegos; J Bueno; C Janov; J Colangelo; A Rao; A Demetris; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1999 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Long-term function and morphology of intestinal allografts in outbred canine transplantation model.

Authors:  K Iwanami; T Ishikawa; T Okuda; Y Zhu; A Tuerler; B A Moore; S Zhang; A J Bauer; R Venkataramanan; K Abu-Elmagd; T E Starzl; M A Nalesnik; N Murase
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  The saga of liver replacement, with particular reference to the reciprocal influence of liver and kidney transplantation (1955-1967).

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Modified technique for combined liver-small bowel transplantation in pigs.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Yin; Xiao-Dong Ni; Feng Jiang; Ning Li; You-Sheng Li; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Auxiliary en-bloc liver-small bowel transplantation with partial pancreas preservation in pigs.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Yin; Xiao-Dong Ni; Feng Jiang; Ning Li; You-Sheng Li; Xiao-Ming Wang; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Upregulation of proapoptotic microRNA mir-125a after massive small bowel resection in rats.

Authors:  Anita Balakrishnan; Adam T Stearns; Peter J Park; Jonathan M Dreyfuss; Stanley W Ashley; David B Rhoads; Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Current status of intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  Takehisa Ueno; Masahiro Fukuzawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.