OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine risk factors associated with graft failure and mortality after transplantation of the intestine alone or as part of an organ complex. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Even with modern immunosuppressive therapies, clinical intestinal transplantation remains a difficult and unreliable procedure. Causes for this and solutions are needed. METHODS: Between May 1990 and February 1995, 71 intestinal transplantations were performed in 66 patients using tacrolimus and low-dose steroids. The first 63 patients, all but one treated 1 to 5 years ago, received either isolated grafts (n = 22), liver and intestinal grafts (n = 30), or multivisceral grafts (n = 11). Three more recipients of allografts who recently underwent surgery and one undergoing retransplantation were given unaltered donor bone marrow cells perioperatively as a biologic adjuvant. RESULTS: Of the first 63 recipients, 32 are alive: 28 have functioning primary grafts and 4 have resumed total parenteral nutrition after graft enterectomy. Thirty-five primary grafts were lost to technical and management errors (n = 10), rejection (n = 6), and infection (n = 19). Regression analysis revealed that duration of surgery, positive donor cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology, inclusion of graft colon, OKT3 use, steroid recycle, and high tacrolimus blood levels contributed to graft loss. All four intestine and bone marrow recipients are alive for 2-3 months without evidence of graft-versus-host disease. CONCLUSION: To improve outcome after intestinal transplantation with previous management protocols, it will be necessary to avoid predictably difficult patients, CMV seropositive donors, and inclusion of the graft colon. Bone marrow transplantation may further improve outcome by ameliorating the biologic barriers of rejection and infection and allowing less restrictive selection criteria.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine risk factors associated with graft failure and mortality after transplantation of the intestine alone or as part of an organ complex. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Even with modern immunosuppressive therapies, clinical intestinal transplantation remains a difficult and unreliable procedure. Causes for this and solutions are needed. METHODS: Between May 1990 and February 1995, 71 intestinal transplantations were performed in 66 patients using tacrolimus and low-dose steroids. The first 63 patients, all but one treated 1 to 5 years ago, received either isolated grafts (n = 22), liver and intestinal grafts (n = 30), or multivisceral grafts (n = 11). Three more recipients of allografts who recently underwent surgery and one undergoing retransplantation were given unaltered donor bone marrow cells perioperatively as a biologic adjuvant. RESULTS: Of the first 63 recipients, 32 are alive: 28 have functioning primary grafts and 4 have resumed total parenteral nutrition after graft enterectomy. Thirty-five primary grafts were lost to technical and management errors (n = 10), rejection (n = 6), and infection (n = 19). Regression analysis revealed that duration of surgery, positive donor cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology, inclusion of graft colon, OKT3 use, steroid recycle, and high tacrolimus blood levels contributed to graft loss. All four intestine and bone marrow recipients are alive for 2-3 months without evidence of graft-versus-host disease. CONCLUSION: To improve outcome after intestinal transplantation with previous management protocols, it will be necessary to avoid predictably difficult patients, CMV seropositive donors, and inclusion of the graft colon. Bone marrow transplantation may further improve outcome by ameliorating the biologic barriers of rejection and infection and allowing less restrictive selection criteria.
Authors: T E Starzl; M I Rowe; S Todo; R Jaffe; A Tzakis; A L Hoffman; C Esquivel; K A Porter; R Venkataramanan; L Makowka Journal: JAMA Date: 1989-03-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: T E Starzl; S Todo; A Tzakis; L Podesta; L Mieles; A Demetris; L Teperman; R Selby; W Stevenson; A Stieber Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1989-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: S Todo; A G Tzakis; K Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; K Nakamura; A Casavilla; R Selby; B M Nour; H Wright; J J Fung Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: D Shaffer; T Maki; S J DeMichele; M D Karlstad; B R Bistrian; K Balogh; A P Monaco Journal: Transplantation Date: 1988-02 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: K Abu-Elmagd; J Fung; J Reyes; A Rao; A Jain; G Mazariegos; W Marsh; J Madariaga; I Dvorchik; J Bueno; J Rogers; J McMichael; F Dodson; H Vargus; J Martin; A Slivka; V Balan; R Corry; J Rakela; N Murase; J Demetris; S Iwatsuki; T Starzl Journal: Clin Transpl Date: 1998
Authors: K M Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; J J Fung; G Mazariegos; J Bueno; D Martin; J Colangelo; A Rao; A Demetris; T E Starzl Journal: Acta Gastroenterol Belg Date: 1999 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: K M Abu-Elmagd; J Reyes; J J Fung; G Mazariegos; J Bueno; C Janov; J Colangelo; A Rao; A Demetris; T E Starzl Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 1999 Feb-Mar Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: K Iwanami; T Ishikawa; T Okuda; Y Zhu; A Tuerler; B A Moore; S Zhang; A J Bauer; R Venkataramanan; K Abu-Elmagd; T E Starzl; M A Nalesnik; N Murase Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Anita Balakrishnan; Adam T Stearns; Peter J Park; Jonathan M Dreyfuss; Stanley W Ashley; David B Rhoads; Ali Tavakkolizadeh Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 12.969