Literature DB >> 8518464

A comparison of laparoscopic and traditional appendectomy.

J L Sosa1, D Sleeman, M G McKenney, J Dygert, D Yarish, L Martin.   

Abstract

Forty-one serially performed laparoscopic appendectomies were compared to 41 randomly selected traditional open appendectomies performed during the same 18 month period. The average age and sex distribution of the two groups were similar. The pathological diagnoses of acute appendicitis and perforation were similar in both groups. The complication rates were not statistically different in the two groups. There were no complications unique to the laparoscopic group. The hospital stay was considerably shorter for patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (p < .05). Statistical significance was found both in patients with and without perforation.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1993        PMID： 8518464     DOI： 10.1089/lps.1993.3.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg        ISSN： 1052-3901


  9 in total

Review 1.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Hiding the scars of an appendectomy. New method of port placement.

Authors:  D Yarish; M McKenney; D Sleeman; L Martin; U Desai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Prevention of respiratory complications after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  J Richardson; S Sabanathan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Hospital charges for Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  J L Sosa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy--review of the first decade.

Authors:  J P McDermott; T F Gorey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  [Laparoscopic appendectomy. A review of the literature].

Authors:  M Gawenda; S Said
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

7.  Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  L C Martin; I Puente; J L Sosa; A Bassin; R Breslaw; M G McKenney; E Ginzburg; D Sleeman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Factors leading to long-term hospitalization after laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Paulo Cezar Galvão do Amaral; Euler de Medeiros Azaro Filho; Thales Delmondes Galvão; Eric Ettinger Junior; Galeno Egydio José de Magalhães Neto; Fabrício Mascarenhas; Edvaldo Fahel
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Thomas Jaschinski; Christoph G Mosch; Michaela Eikermann; Edmund Am Neugebauer; Stefan Sauerland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.