Literature DB >> 7675159

Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia.

M J Farah1, K L Levinson, K L Klein.   

Abstract

Prosopagnosics are impaired at face recognition, but unimpaired, or relatively less impaired, at common object recognition. It has been suggested that this dissociation results simply from the greater difficulty of face recognition compared to object recognition, or from the greater need to discriminate visually similar members of a single category in face recognition compared to object recognition. We tested these hypotheses using the performance of normal subjects in an 'old/new' recognition paradigm to establish the true relative difficulty of face and object recognition, and required both normal subjects and a prosopagnosic subject to discriminate both faces and visually similar exemplars of nonface object categories. In two different experiments, the prosopagnosic patient performed disproportionately poorly with faces. These results disconfirm the hypotheses described above, and imply that prosopagnosia is an impairment of a specialized form of visual recognition that is necessary for face recognition and is not necessary, or less necessary, for the recognition of common objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7675159     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00002-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  20 in total

1.  Recognizing the un-real McCoy: priming and the modularity of face recognition.

Authors:  Therese F Faulkner; Gillian Rhodes; Romina Palermo; Elizabeth Pellicano; Diane Ferguson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

2.  Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure.

Authors:  Rob Jenkins; Nilli Lavie; Jon Driver
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

3.  Selectivity for the configural cues that identify the gender, ethnicity, and identity of faces in human cortex.

Authors:  Minna Ng; Vivian M Ciaramitaro; Stuart Anstis; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Why is the fusiform face area recruited for novel categories of expertise? A neurocomputational investigation.

Authors:  Matthew H Tong; Carrie A Joyce; Garrison W Cottrell
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  The contribution of the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in processing facial attractiveness: neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  G Iaria; C J Fox; C T Waite; I Aharon; J J S Barton
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-06-08       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  Functional outcomes following lesions in visual cortex: Implications for plasticity of high-level vision.

Authors:  Tina T Liu; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Illusions of face memory: Clarity breeds familiarity.

Authors:  Heather M Kleider; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 8.  The cognitive neuroscience of human memory since H.M.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; John T Wixted
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Autism and the development of face processing.

Authors:  Golijeh Golarai; Kalanit Grill-Spector; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Clin Neurosci Res       Date:  2006-10

10.  Voxel-based morphometry reveals reduced grey matter volume in the temporal cortex of developmental prosopagnosics.

Authors:  Lúcia Garrido; Nicholas Furl; Bogdan Draganski; Nikolaus Weiskopf; John Stevens; Geoffrey Chern-Yee Tan; Jon Driver; Ray J Dolan; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.