Literature DB >> 18590800

The contribution of the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in processing facial attractiveness: neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence.

G Iaria1, C J Fox, C T Waite, I Aharon, J J S Barton.   

Abstract

Current cognitive models suggest that the processing of dynamic facial attributes, including social signals such as gaze direction and facial expression, involves the superior temporal sulcus, whereas the processing of invariant facial structure such as the individuals' identity involves the fusiform face area. Where facial attractiveness, a social signal that may emerge from invariant facial structure, is processed within this dual-route model of face perception is uncertain. Here, we present two studies. First, we investigated the explicit judgments of facial attractiveness and attractiveness-motivated behavior in patients with acquired prosopagnosia, a deficit in familiar face recognition usually associated with damage to medial occipitotemporal cortex. We found that both abilities were impaired in these patients, with some weak residual ability for attractiveness judgments found only in those patients with unilateral right occipitotemporal or bilateral anterior temporal lesions. Importantly, deficits in attractiveness perception correlated with the severity of the face recognition deficit. Second, we performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy subjects that included an implicit and explicit processing of facial attractiveness. We found increased neural activity when explicitly judging facial attractiveness within a number of cortical regions including the fusiform face area, but not the superior temporal sulcus, indicating a potential contribution of the fusiform face area to this judgment. Thus, converging neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence points to a critical role of the inferior occipitotemporal cortex in the processing of facial attractiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18590800      PMCID: PMC2605709          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.05.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  47 in total

1.  Effects of the height of the internal features of faces on adults' aesthetic ratings and 5-month-olds' looking times.

Authors:  S Geldart; D Maurer; H Henderson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  J Sergent; S Ohta; B MacDonald
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception.

Authors:  Scott L Fairhall; Alumit Ishai
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Alison M Harris; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The covert priming effect of faces in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Jason J S Barton; Mariya V Cherkasova; Rebecca Hefter
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  The perception of curvature can be selectively disrupted in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; S E Hamilton; J H Bernstein
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms.

Authors:  A R Damasio; H Damasio; G W Van Hoesen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway.

Authors:  A Ishai; L G Ungerleider; A Martin; J L Schouten; J V Haxby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Results of an explorative empirical study on human mating in Germany: handsome men, not high-status men, succeed in courtship.

Authors:  Alexander Pashos; Carsten Niemitz
Journal:  Anthropol Anz       Date:  2003-09

10.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area.

Authors:  Jennifer K E Steeves; Jody C Culham; Bradley C Duchaine; Cristiana Cavina Pratesi; Kenneth F Valyear; Igor Schindler; G Keith Humphrey; A David Milner; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  18 in total

1.  The social evaluation of faces: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Peter Mende-Siedlecki; Christopher P Said; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness.

Authors:  D Bzdok; R Langner; S Caspers; F Kurth; U Habel; K Zilles; A Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  The modular neuroarchitecture of social judgments on faces.

Authors:  Danilo Bzdok; Robert Langner; Felix Hoffstaedter; Bruce I Turetsky; Karl Zilles; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Is social categorization based on relational ingroup/outgroup opposition? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aleksandr V Shkurko
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Voice Recognition in Face-Blind Patients.

Authors:  Ran R Liu; Raika Pancaroglu; Charlotte S Hills; Brad Duchaine; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Remembering beauty: roles of orbitofrontal and hippocampal regions in successful memory encoding of attractive faces.

Authors:  Takashi Tsukiura; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Neural responses to facial attractiveness in the judgments of moral goodness and moral beauty.

Authors:  Qiuping Cheng; Zhili Han; Shun Liu; Yilong Kong; Xuchu Weng; Lei Mo
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.270

8.  The neural correlates of beauty comparison.

Authors:  Gayannée Kedia; Thomas Mussweiler; Paul Mullins; David E J Linden
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Richard Russell; P Matthew Bronstad; Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Jordan W Smoller; Holum Kwok; Samuel E Anthony; Ken Nakayama; Gillian Rhodes; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Hierarchical Region-Network Sparsity for High-Dimensional Inference in Brain Imaging.

Authors:  Danilo Bzdok; Michael Eickenberg; Gaël Varoquaux; Bertrand Thirion
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2017-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.