Literature DB >> 29129957

Illusions of face memory: Clarity breeds familiarity.

Heather M Kleider1, Stephen D Goldinger1.   

Abstract

When people perform a recognition memory task, they may avail themselves of different forms of information. For example, they may recall specific learning episodes, or rely on general feelings of familiarity. Although subjective familiarity is often valid, it can make people vulnerable to memory illusions. Research using verbal materials has shown that "old" responses are often increased by enhancing perceptual fluency, as when selected words are shown with relatively higher contrast on a computer. Conversely, episodic memory can create an erroneous sense of perceptual advantages for recently studied words. In this investigation, symmetric fluency effects were tested in face memory, a domain that is often considered neurologically and psychologically unique. In eight experiments involving over 800 participants, we found consistent memorial and perceptual illusions-fluency created feelings of familiarity, and familiarity created feelings of fluency. In both directions, these effects were manifested as response biases, suggesting effects based on memorial and perceptual attributions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Face recognition; Fluency; Heuristics; Recognition memory

Year:  2003        PMID: 29129957      PMCID: PMC5676565          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  22 in total

1.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The marriage of perception and memory: creating two-way illusions with words and voices.

Authors:  S D Goldinger; H M Kleider; E Shelley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

3.  What memory is for.

Authors:  A M Glenberg
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; L Strater; A Fulton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-03

5.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline.

Authors:  M H Johnson; S Dziurawiec; H Ellis; J Morton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-08

6.  Direct versus indirect tests of memory for source: judgments of modality.

Authors:  C M Kelley; L L Jacoby; A Hollingshead
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance.

Authors:  G Rhodes
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect.

Authors:  A J O'Toole; K A Deffenbacher; D Valentin; H Abdi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-03

9.  The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: fluency, generation, and resemblance.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; J P Leboe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-03

10.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Accurate forced-choice recognition without awareness of memory retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Carol L Baym; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.

Authors:  Matthew G Rhodes; Amber E Witherby; Alan D Castel; Kou Murayama
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

3.  A metacognitive illusion in monkeys.

Authors:  Stephen Ferrigno; Nate Kornell; Jessica F Cantlon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The perception of time is dynamically interlocked with the facial muscle activity.

Authors:  Alexandre C Fernandes; Teresa Garcia-Marques
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.