Literature DB >> 7673870

Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: evidence from English and Hebrew.

L B Feldman1, R Frost, T Pnini.   

Abstract

Participants segmented and shifted a sequence of letters from a source word to a target word and then named the product aloud. Morphemic and nonmorphemic letter sequences (e.g., EN) from phonemically matched words such as HARDEN and GARDEN were compared. In 4 experiments, naming latencies were faster for morphemic sequences than their nonmorphemic controls in both English, in which the morphemic status of the shifted sequence was varied and sequences were appended after the base morpheme (linearly concatenated), and in Hebrew, in which morphological transparency of the root (base morpheme) was varied and 1 morpheme was infixed inside the other (nonconcatenative) so that the phonological and orthographic integrity of the morphemic constituents was disrupted. Moreover, the likelihood with which both affixes and bases combine to form words influenced segment shifting times. In conclusion, skilled readers are sensitive to the morphological components of words whether or not they form contiguous orthographic or phonological units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7673870     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Sami Boudelaa; William D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Morphological Decomposition in Reading Hebrew Homographs.

Authors:  Paul Miller; Batel Liran-Hazan; Vered Vaknin
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-06

3.  Does a focus on universals represent a new trend in word recognition?

Authors:  Laurie Beth Feldman; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?

Authors:  Hadas Velan; Ram Frost
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-15

5.  Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew.

Authors:  Hadas Velan; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  What predicts successful literacy acquisition in a second language?

Authors:  Ram Frost; Noam Siegelman; Alona Narkiss; Liron Afek
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-05-22

7.  Imaging implicit morphological processing: evidence from Hebrew.

Authors:  Atira S Bick; Ram Frost; Gadi Goelman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Morphological structure in the Arabic mental lexicon: Parallels between standard and dialectal Arabic.

Authors:  Sami Boudelaa; William D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-10-31

9.  Neural Correlates of Morphological Processing: Evidence from Chinese.

Authors:  Lijuan Zou; Jerome L Packard; Zhichao Xia; Youyi Liu; Hua Shu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Evidence from neglect dyslexia for morphological decomposition at the early stages of orthographic-visual analysis.

Authors:  Julia Reznick; Naama Friedmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.