Literature DB >> 22931560

Does a focus on universals represent a new trend in word recognition?

Laurie Beth Feldman1, Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín.   

Abstract

Comparisons across languages have long been a means to investigate universal properties of the cognitive system. Although differences between languages may be salient, it is the underlying similarities that have advanced our understanding of language processing. Frost is not unique in emphasizing that the interaction among linguistic codes reinforces the inadequacy of constructing a model of word recognition where orthographic processes operate in isolation.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22931560      PMCID： PMC3694129          DOI： 10.1017/S0140525X12000295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN： 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  9 in total

1.  Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology.

Authors:  R Frost; A Deutsch; K I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Morphological priming: dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors.

Authors:  R Frost; A Deutsch; O Gilboa; M Tannenbaum; W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

3.  Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language.

Authors:  Ram Frost; Tamar Kugler; Avital Deutsch; Kenneth I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: evidence from English and Hebrew.

Authors:  L B Feldman; R Frost; T Pnini
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation.

Authors:  R Frost; K I Forster; A Deutsch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison.

Authors:  R Frost; L Katz; S Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: evidence from Hebrew.

Authors:  L B Feldman; S Bentin
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1994-05

8.  Are CORNER and BROTHER Morphologically Complex? Not in the Long Term.

Authors:  Jay G Rueckl; Karen Aicher
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2008-11-13

9.  Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: a violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition.

Authors:  Laurie Beth Feldman; Patrick A O'Connor; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.