Literature DB >> 7673290

The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model.

J E Feighan1, V M Goldberg, D Davy, J A Parr, S Stevenson.   

Abstract

The apposition of new bone to polished solid implants and to implants with surfaces that had been blasted with one of three methods of grit-blasting was studied in a rabbit intramedullary model to test the hypothesis that blasted implant surfaces support osseous integration. Intramedullary titanium-alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) plugs, press-fit into the distal aspect of the femoral canal, were implanted bilaterally in fifty-six rabbits. Four surface treatments were studied: polished (a surface roughness of 0.4 to 0.6 micrometer) and blasted with stainless-steel shot (a surface roughness of five to seven micrometers), with thirty-six-grit aluminum oxide (a surface roughness of five to seven micrometers), or with sixty-grit aluminum oxide (a surface roughness of three to five micrometers). Localized attachment of new bone to the surfaces of the blasted implants was present radiographically at twelve weeks. The total bone area was significantly affected by the level of the section (the diaphysis had a greater bone area than the proximal part of the metaphysis and the proximal part of the metaphysis had a greater bone area than the distal part of the metaphysis; p < 0.001) and the quadrant within each section (the posterior and anterior quadrants had greater bone area than the medial and lateral quadrants; p < 0.00001). The length of the bone-implant interface was significantly affected by the surface treatment (the length of the bone-implant interface for the implants that had been blasted with sixty-grit aluminum oxide was greater than the length for the polished implants; p = 0.02), the time after implantation (the interface was longer at six and twelve weeks than at three weeks; p < 0.00001), and the level of the section (the interface was longer at the diaphysis than at the proximal part of the metaphysis and longer at the proximal part of the metaphysis than at the distal part of the metaphysis; p = 0.004). Blasting of the surface of titanium-alloy implants did not have an effect on the area of bone formation around the implants, but it did significantly affect the area of bone formation on the implant and the shear strength at the bone-implant interface. The two effects were not necessarily parallel, as significantly less (p < 0.05) bone formed on implants that had been blasted with stainless-steel shot than on those blasted with aluminum grit, whereas their interface shear strengths were similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7673290     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199509000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  20 in total

Review 1.  Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics: A Review of Their History, Structure, Properties, Coating Technologies and Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Noam Eliaz; Noah Metoki
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  An assessment of the biological fixation of a retrieved Mayo femoral component.

Authors:  Russell D Meldrum; Bettina M Willie; Roy D Bloebaum
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

3.  Physical and biological characterizations of a novel multiphase anodic spark deposition coating to enhance implant osseointegration.

Authors:  Carmen Giordano; Roberto Chiesa; Enrico Sandrini; Alberto Cigada; Gianluca Giavaresi; Milena Fini; Roberto Giardino
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Multiscale mechanics of hierarchical structure/property relationships in calcified tissues and tissue/material interfaces.

Authors:  J Lawrence Katz; Anil Misra; Paulette Spencer; Yong Wang; Sauwanan Bumrerraj; Tsutomu Nomura; Steven J Eppell; Massood Tabib-Azar
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.234

5.  The effect of surface treatments on the adhesion of electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coating to titanium and on its interaction with cells and bacteria.

Authors:  Noam Eliaz; Oshrit Ritman-Hertz; Daniel Aronov; Evgeny Weinberg; Yotam Shenhar; Gil Rosenman; Miron Weinreb; Eliora Ron
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Surface contaminants inhibit osseointegration in a novel murine model.

Authors:  Lindsay A Bonsignore; Robb W Colbrunn; Joscelyn M Tatro; Patrick J Messerschmitt; Christopher J Hernandez; Victor M Goldberg; Matthew C Stewart; Edward M Greenfield
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Osseointegration in arthroplasty: can simvastatin promote bone response to implants?

Authors:  Kerem Başarir; Bülent Erdemli; Alp Can; Esra Erdemli; Tuğba Zeyrek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  An in vivo evaluation of bone response to three implant surfaces using a rabbit intramedullary rod model.

Authors:  Juan C Hermida; Arnie Bergula; Fred Dimaano; Monica Hawkins; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Tensile force testing of optimized coin-shaped titanium implant attachment kinetics in the rabbit tibiae.

Authors:  Hans Jacob Rønold; Jan Eirik Ellingsen; Ståle Petter Lyngstadaas
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Biocompatibility studies of human fetal osteoblast cells cultured on gamma titanium aluminide.

Authors:  Omayra Rivera-Denizard; Nannette Diffoot-Carlo; Vivian Navas; Paul A Sundaram
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.