Literature DB >> 21801863

Surface contaminants inhibit osseointegration in a novel murine model.

Lindsay A Bonsignore1, Robb W Colbrunn, Joscelyn M Tatro, Patrick J Messerschmitt, Christopher J Hernandez, Victor M Goldberg, Matthew C Stewart, Edward M Greenfield.   

Abstract

Surface contaminants, such as bacterial debris and manufacturing residues, may remain on orthopedic implants after sterilization procedures and affect osseointegration. The goals of this study were to develop a murine model of osseointegration in order to determine whether removing surface contaminants enhances osseointegration. To develop the murine model, titanium alloy implants were implanted into a unicortical pilot hole in the mid-diaphysis of the femur and osseointegration was measured over a five week time course. Histology, backscatter scanning electron microscopy and X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy showed areas of bone in intimate physical contact with the implant, confirming osseointegration. Histomorphometric quantification of bone-to-implant contact and peri-implant bone and biomechanical pullout quantification of ultimate force, stiffness and work to failure increased significantly over time, also demonstrating successful osseointegration. We also found that a rigorous cleaning procedure significantly enhances bone-to-implant contact and biomechanical pullout measures by two-fold compared with implants that were autoclaved, as recommended by the manufacturer. The most likely interpretation of these results is that surface contaminants inhibit osseointegration. The results of this study justify the need for the development of better detection and removal techniques for contaminants on orthopedic implants and other medical devices.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21801863      PMCID: PMC3200470          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  55 in total

1.  Parathyroid hormone 1-34 enhances titanium implant anchorage in low-density trabecular bone: a correlative micro-computed tomographic and biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Yankel Gabet; Ralph Müller; Jay Levy; Richard Dimarchi; Michael Chorev; Itai Bab; David Kohavi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Improved long-term bone-implant integration. Experiments in transgenic mice overexpressing bovine growth hormone.

Authors:  P H Morberg; O G Isaksson; C B Johansson; J Sandstedt; J Törnell
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1997-08

3.  Biology of grit-blasted titanium alloy implants.

Authors:  V M Goldberg; S Stevenson; J Feighan; D Davy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Endotoxins and medical devices.

Authors:  V C Ross; C W Twohy
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1985

5.  Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space.

Authors:  T P Schmalzried; M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Altered bioreactivity and limited osteoconductivity of calcium sulfate-based bone cements in the osteoporotic rat spine.

Authors:  Mark L Wang; Jennifer Massie; Richard T Allen; Yu-Po Lee; Choll W Kim
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

8.  A comparative study on the effect of nicotine administration and cigarette smoke inhalation on bone healing around titanium implants.

Authors:  João B César-Neto; Poliana M Duarte; Enilson A Sallum; Deise Barbieri; Heitor Moreno; Francisco H Nociti
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 9.  TLR2 - promiscuous or specific? A critical re-evaluation of a receptor expressing apparent broad specificity.

Authors:  Ulrich Zähringer; Buko Lindner; Seiichi Inamura; Holger Heine; Christian Alexander
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.144

10.  Endosseous implant anchorage is critically dependent on mechanostructural determinants of peri-implant bone trabeculae.

Authors:  Yankel Gabet; David Kohavi; Romain Voide; Thomas L Mueller; Ralph Müller; Itai Bab
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  4 in total

1.  Adherent lipopolysaccharide inhibits the osseointegration of orthopedic implants by impairing osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Lindsay A Bonsignore; J Robert Anderson; Zhenghong Lee; Victor M Goldberg; Edward M Greenfield
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Immunomodulatory Peptide IDR-1018 Decreases Implant Infection and Preserves Osseointegration.

Authors:  Hyonmin Choe; Arvind S Narayanan; Deep A Gandhi; Aaron Weinberg; Randall E Marcus; Zhenghong Lee; Robert A Bonomo; Edward M Greenfield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii Inhibit Osseointegration of Orthopedic Implants.

Authors:  Hyonmin Choe; Joscelyn M Tatro; Bryan S Hausman; Kristine M Hujer; Steve H Marshall; Ozan Akkus; Phillip N Rather; Zhenghong Lee; Robert A Bonomo; Edward M Greenfield
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Osteoblast differentiation is enhanced by a nano-to-micro hybrid titanium surface created by Yb:YAG laser irradiation.

Authors:  Eduardo Mariscal-Muñoz; Carlos A S Costa; Hewerson S Tavares; Jonas Bianchi; Josimeri Hebling; João P B Machado; Ulf H Lerner; Pedro P C Souza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.573

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.