Literature DB >> 7671512

Extramedullary versus intramedullary alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty.

Y Ishii1, G Ohmori, J E Bechtold, R B Gustilo.   

Abstract

Use of extramedullary and intramedullary guides to prepare the tibia was studied comparatively in 100 consecutive primary total knee arthroplasties done by a single surgeon. Each type of guide was used in 50 consecutive cases, for a total of 100 cases. In all cases, an intramedullary guide was used to prepare the distal femur. Long (hip to ankle) anteroposterior radiographs were taken postoperatively to measure the mechanical angle, tibial component angle, femoral component angle, physiologic valgus angle, and tibiofemoral angle. No significant differences between the extramedullary and intramedullary groups were found; each system allowed satisfactory alignment. It is important for the surgeon to appreciate the benefits and deficiencies of each guide and to use whichever is suited most properly in each particular case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7671512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  25 in total

1.  The accuracy of intramedullary tibial guide of sagittal alignment of PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hyuk-Soo Han; Seung-Baik Kang; Chris H Jo; Sun-Hong Kim; Jung-Ha Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Editorial: What is varus or valgus knee alignment?: a call for a uniform radiographic classification.

Authors:  Atul F Kamath; Craig Israelite; John Horneff; Paul A Lotke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The accuracy of extramedullary guides for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Y Chiu; W P Yau; T P Ng; W M Tang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Computer navigation did not improve alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice.

Authors:  W P Yau; K Y Chiu; J L Zuo; W M Tang; T P Ng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ralf E Rosenberger; Christian Hoser; Sebastian Quirbach; Rene Attal; Alfred Hennerbichler; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Reliability of leg alignment using the OrthoPilot system depends on knee position: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Oliver Hauschild; L Konstantinidis; P C Strohm; P Niemeyer; N P Suedkamp; P Helwig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Less invasive TKA: extramedullary femoral reference without navigation.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Paolo Adravanti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Are MRI-based, patient matched cutting jigs as accurate as the tibial guides?

Authors:  Fabio Conteduca; Raffaele Iorio; Daniele Mazza; Ludovico Caperna; Gabriele Bolle; Giuseppe Argento; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Proximal tibial resection in varus-deformed tibiae during total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro study using sawbone model.

Authors:  Sang-Min Kim; Keun-Woo Kim; Sung-Mu Cha; Kye-Young Han
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Improving tibial component alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G Cinotti; P Sessa; A D'Arino; F R Ripani; G Giannicola
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.