Literature DB >> 7670682

Management and survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum: a national survey of the Commission on Cancer.

R W Beart1, G D Steele, H R Menck, J S Chmiel, K E Ocwieja, D P Winchester.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Commission on Cancer (COC) of The American College of Surgeons periodically reviews criteria for evaluation of the care of patients with cancer related to diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and follow-up. The COC annually performs a national survey of practices for several cancer sites. STUDY
DESIGN: Data collection forms for carcinoma of the colon and rectum were field-tested and then forwarded to participating hospitals. The study included a long-term survey to permit evaluation of five-year survival rates and a short-term survey to review current practices and time trends. Specific questions were asked concerning disease presentation, preoperative evaluation, surgical treatment, postoperative care, use of adjuvant therapy, and disease status at the last follow-up examination.
RESULTS: A total of 39,502 reports from 943 hospitals were analyzed, including 12,682 patients with carcinoma of the colon diagnosed in 1983, 16,527 patients with carcinoma of the colon diagnosed in 1988, 4,597 patients with carcinoma of the rectum diagnosed in 1983; and 5,696 patients with carcinoma of the rectum diagnosed in 1988. Patterns of care, including changes in presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic management, and survival rates, are presented. Specific data showing results for various ethnic groups are also included.
CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of cases by anatomic site was consistent with a hypothesis of rightward migration of colon carcinoma. Colon and rectal carcinomas in African-Americans were reported in more advanced stages and with corresponding decreases in survival rates. Some patterns of nonoptimal diagnostic use were noted. The increasing use of sphincter-sparing surgical alternatives for carcinoma of the rectum was evident. Adjuvant therapy was not widely used during this period. This study suggests evolving patterns of evaluation, increased preservation of continence, and improved but varying survival among ethnic groups. It further suggests that survival as measured across these 943 hospitals may be lower than that attained at some individual centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7670682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  22 in total

1.  Postsurgical disparity in survival between African Americans and Caucasians with colonic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dominik Alexander; Chakrapani Chatla; Ellen Funkhouser; Sreelatha Meleth; William E Grizzle; Upender Manne
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Surgery for colorectal cancer in a low-volume unit: assessment of key issues in the achievement of acceptable clinical results.

Authors:  Hannu Paimela; Outi Lindström; Timo Tomminen; Mauri Iivonen; Esa Könönen; Pekka Kuusanmäki
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2005

3.  Adenocarcinoma of the ileocolic junction and multifocal hepatic sarcomas in an aged rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Cynthia D Lang; Judith S Daviau; Daniel A Merton; Susan M Caraker
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 4.  What we could do now: molecular pathology of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R S Houlston
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2001-08

5.  Predictors of referral for adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Ong; James M Watters; Eva Grunfeld; Keith O'Rourke
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Reoperation as a quality indicator in colorectal surgery: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Arden M Morris; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Barbara Matthews; Jason A Dominitz; William E Barlow; Sharon A Dobie; Kevin G Billingsley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Use of surgical procedures and adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer treatment: a population-based study.

Authors:  A T Schroen; R D Cress
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer.

Authors:  E Kuhry; H J Bonjer; E Haglind; W C J Hop; R Veldkamp; M A Cuesta; J Jeekel; L Påhlman; M Morino; A Lacy; S Delgado
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The investigation of primary rectal cancer by surgeons: current pattern of practice.

Authors:  Todd P W McMullen; Alexandra M Easson; Zane Cohen; Carol J Swallow
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 10.  The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.