Literature DB >> 18792537

Clinical trials of drugs used off-label in neonates: ethical issues and alternative study designs.

Sanjiv B Amin1, Michael P McDermott, Adil E Shamoo.   

Abstract

The use of drugs for indications unapproved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), often called "off label use, "is widespread in children, including neonates. The widespread off-label use of drugs in neonates presents ethical and safety challenges. Since the passage of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) in 2002, both the FDA and National Institutes of Health (NIH) have taken initiatives to facilitate and encourage research to achieve the necessary labeling for drugs routinely used in infants and children. Federal regulations provide broad rules and guidance for the protection of human subjects in research. However, there are ethical issues that a physician may face when designing clinical trials of drugs in neonates that are routinely used off-label and widely believed to be beneficial. We attempt to describe these ethical challenges and provide recommendations, including alternative study designs, to resolve them in an ethical framework that takes into account the Belmont Report, the statement of the World Medical Association (WMA), and federal regulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18792537      PMCID: PMC3103770          DOI: 10.1080/08989620802194392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  58 in total

1.  Randomized play-the-winner clinical trials: review and recommendations.

Authors:  W F Rosenberger
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-08

2.  Off-label uses of drugs in children.

Authors:  J L Blumer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Ethics and practice: alternative designs for phase III randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  C R Palmer; W F Rosenberger
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-04

4.  Regulations requiring manufacturers to assess the safety and effectiveness of new drugs and biological products in pediatric patients--FDA. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1998-12-02

5.  A comparison of the randomized play-the-winner rule and the triangular test for clinical trials with binary responses.

Authors:  D S Coad; W F Rosenberger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Investigational new drug application; exception from informed consent; technical amendment--FDA. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1997-06-16

7.  Conventional consent with opting in versus simplified consent with opting out: an exploratory trial for studies that do not increase patient risk.

Authors:  C G Rogers; J E Tyson; K A Kennedy; R S Broyles; J F Hickman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial.

Authors:  C Snowdon; J Garcia; D Elbourne
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Informed consent in medical research. Consent is not always practical in emergency treatments.

Authors:  C Morley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-05-17

10.  Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children.

Authors:  S C Harth; Y H Thong
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  7 in total

1.  Development and verification of a pharmacokinetic model to optimize physiologic replacement of rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 in preterm infants.

Authors:  Jou-Ku Chung; Boubou Hallberg; Ingrid Hansen-Pupp; Martin A Graham; Gerald Fetterly; Jyoti Sharma; Adina Tocoian; Nerissa C Kreher; Norman Barton; Ann Hellström; David Ley
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Challenges in conducting clinical trials in children: approaches for improving performance.

Authors:  Steven E Kern
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 5.045

3.  Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations?

Authors:  Mufiza Farid-Kapadia; Lisa Askie; Lisa Hartling; Despina Contopoulos-Ioannidis; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Roger Soll; David Moher; Martin Offringa
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 4.  Recommendations for the design of therapeutic trials for neonatal seizures.

Authors:  Janet S Soul; Ronit Pressler; Marilee Allen; Geraldine Boylan; Heike Rabe; Ron Portman; Pollyanna Hardy; Sarah Zohar; Klaus Romero; Brian Tseng; Varsha Bhatt-Mehta; Cecil Hahn; Scott Denne; Stephane Auvin; Alexander Vinks; John Lantos; Neil Marlow; Jonathan M Davis
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Pediatric clinical trials.

Authors:  Sandeep B Bavdekar
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2013-01

6.  Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews.

Authors:  April V P Clyburne-Sherin; Pravheen Thurairajah; Mufiza Z Kapadia; Margaret Sampson; Winnie W Y Chan; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the analytical (theoretical/philosophical) research.

Authors:  Christopher Megone; Eleanor Wilman; Sandy Oliver; Lelia Duley; Gill Gyte; Judy Wright
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.