Literature DB >> 7666425

Destabilization of a protein helix by electrostatic interactions.

S Walter1, B Hubner, U Hahn, F X Schmid.   

Abstract

Electrostatic interactions between charged residues and the helix dipole in a protein were investigated by protein engineering methods. In ribonuclease T1, two surface-exposed acidic residues (Glu28 and Asp29) are located near the carboxyl terminus of the alpha-helix between residues 13 and 29. They were replaced, individually and in concert, by the uncharged amides Gln28 and Asn29, and the stabilities of the wild-type protein and its variants were determined as a function of pH. The effects of the two mutations are additive. Either one leads to a marginal destabilization by 0.7 kJ/mol at pH 2 but to a strong stabilization by about 3.2 kJ/mol at pH 7. This suggests that the deprotonations of Glu28 and Asp29 reduce the free energy of stabilization of folded ribonuclease T1 by about 4 kJ/mol each. This destabilization is probably caused by unfavorable electrostatic interactions of Glu28 and Asp29 with the negative end of the helix dipole. The activation energies for the unfolding of the different variants of ribonuclease T1 change in parallel with the differences in the thermodynamic stability when the pH is varied. This indicates that the unfavorable electrostatic interactions of Glu28 and Asp29 are lost very early in unfolding, and are not present in the activated state of unfolding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7666425     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  6 in total

1.  Structure of a protein G helix variant suggests the importance of helix propensity and helix dipole interactions in protein design.

Authors:  P Strop; A M Marinescu; S L Mayo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Local and macroscopic electrostatic interactions in single α-helices.

Authors:  Emily G Baker; Gail J Bartlett; Matthew P Crump; Richard B Sessions; Noah Linden; Charl F J Faul; Derek N Woolfson
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 15.040

3.  Beta-turn propensities as paradigms for the analysis of structural motifs to engineer protein stability.

Authors:  E C Ohage; W Graml; M M Walter; S Steinbacher; B Steipe
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  A direct comparison of helix propensity in proteins and peptides.

Authors:  J K Myers; C N Pace; J M Scholtz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Electrostatic interactions affecting the active site of class sigma glutathione S-transferase.

Authors:  J M Stevens; R N Armstrong; H W Dirr
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Kinetic studies on strand displacement in de novo designed parallel heterodimeric coiled coils.

Authors:  Mike C Groth; W Mathis Rink; Nils F Meyer; Franziska Thomas
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 9.825

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.