Emily G Baker1, Gail J Bartlett1, Matthew P Crump1, Richard B Sessions2, Noah Linden3, Charl F J Faul1, Derek N Woolfson4. 1. School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 2. School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 3. School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 4. 1] School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. [2] School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
The noncovalent forces that stabilize protein structures are not fully understood. One way to address this is to study equilibria between unfolded states and α-helices in peptides. Electrostatic forces-which include interactions between side chains, the backbone and side chains, and side chains and the helix macrodipole-are believed to contribute to these equilibria. Here we probe these interactions experimentally using designed peptides. We find that both terminal backbone-side chain and certain side chain-side chain interactions (which include both local effects between proximal charges and interatomic contacts) contribute much more to helix stability than side chain-helix macrodipole electrostatics, which are believed to operate at larger distances. This has implications for current descriptions of helix stability, the understanding of protein folding and the refinement of force fields for biomolecular modeling and simulations. In addition, this study sheds light on the stability of rod-like structures formed by single α-helices, which are common in natural proteins such as non-muscle myosins.
The noncovalent forces that stabilize protein structures are not fully understood. One way to address this is to study equilibria between unfolded states and α-helices in peptides. Electrostatic forces-which include intern class="Chemical">actions between side chains, the backbone and side chains, and side chains and the helix macrodipole-are believed to contribute to these equilibria. Here we probe these interactions experimentally using designed peptides. We find that both terminal backbone-side chain and certain side chain-side chain interactions (which include both local effects between proximal charges and interatomic contacts) contribute much more to helix stability than side chain-helix macrodipole electrostatics, which are believed to operate at larger distances. This has implications for current descriptions of helix stability, the understanding of protein folding and the refinement of force fields for biomolecular modeling and simulations. In addition, this study sheds light on the stability of rod-like structures formed by single α-helices, which are common in natural proteins such as non-muscle myosins.
Authors: Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan; Benjamin J Spink; Adelene Y L Sim; Sebastian Doniach; James A Spudich Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yi Yang; Thomas G Baboolal; Verl Siththanandan; Michael Chen; Matthew L Walker; Peter J Knight; Michelle Peckham; James R Sellers Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-03-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Thomas G Baboolal; Takeshi Sakamoto; Eva Forgacs; Howard D White; Scott M Jackson; Yasuharu Takagi; Rachel E Farrow; Justin E Molloy; Peter J Knight; James R Sellers; Michelle Peckham Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Benjamin J Spink; Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan; Jan Lipfert; Sebastian Doniach; James A Spudich Journal: Nat Struct Mol Biol Date: 2008-05-30 Impact factor: 15.369
Authors: Emily G Baker; Gail J Bartlett; Matthew P Crump; Richard B Sessions; Noah Linden; Charl F J Faul; Derek N Woolfson Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Corey J Wilson; Andreas S Bommarius; Julie A Champion; Yury O Chernoff; David G Lynn; Anant K Paravastu; Chen Liang; Ming-Chien Hsieh; Jennifer M Heemstra Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Michal Doležal; Romana Hadravová; Milan Kožíšek; Lucie Bednárová; Hana Langerová; Tomáš Ruml; Michaela Rumlová Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Emily G Baker; Christopher Williams; Kieran L Hudson; Gail J Bartlett; Jack W Heal; Kathryn L Porter Goff; Richard B Sessions; Matthew P Crump; Derek N Woolfson Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Gabriel J Rocklin; Tamuka M Chidyausiku; Inna Goreshnik; Alex Ford; Scott Houliston; Alexander Lemak; Lauren Carter; Rashmi Ravichandran; Vikram K Mulligan; Aaron Chevalier; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; David Baker Journal: Science Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Scott E Boyken; Zibo Chen; Benjamin Groves; Robert A Langan; Gustav Oberdorfer; Alex Ford; Jason M Gilmore; Chunfu Xu; Frank DiMaio; Jose Henrique Pereira; Banumathi Sankaran; Georg Seelig; Peter H Zwart; David Baker Journal: Science Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 47.728