Literature DB >> 7661346

Biopharmaceutics of a new transdermal fentanyl device.

P Fiset1, C Cohane, S Browne, S C Brand, S L Shafer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compared with conventional routes of delivering potent analgesics to postoperative patients, transdermal administration of fentanyl offers the advantages of simplicity and noninvasive delivery. The only available form of transdermal fentanyl, the Duragesic system, has been implicated in preventable patient deaths when used for postoperative analgesia and is contraindicated in the management of postoperative pain. We examined the biopharmaceutics of a new transdermal fentanyl device developed by Cygnus and intended for use as a postoperative analgesic to see whether the new formulation offers pharmacokinetic advantages that might permit safe use in postoperative patients.
METHODS: We studied 15 consenting male adult surgical patients. Patients received 650 or 750 micrograms intravenous fentanyl as part of the induction of anesthesia. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured over the following 24-h period. On the first postoperative day, 24 h after the intravenous dose of fentanyl, a transdermal fentanyl device was placed on the upper torso of the patient for 24 h and then removed. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured for 72 h after application of the transdermal fentanyl device. From the concentration versus time profile for the 24 h after intravenous fentanyl administration we determined each patient's clearance and unit disposition function by moment analysis and constrained numeric deconvolution, respectively. From the concentration versus time profile for the 72 h after application of the transdermal device we determined the amount of fentanyl absorbed and the rate of absorption, again by moment analysis and constrained numeric deconvolution. The residual fentanyl in the transdermal fentanyl device was measured, permitting calculation of the absolute bioavailability of transdermally administered fentanyl.
RESULTS: Of the 14 subjects who received transdermal fentanyl, 3 had clinically significant fentanyl toxicity, mandating early removal of the device. The range during the plateau from 12 to 24 h in subjects still wearing the device was 0.34-6.75 ng/ml, a 20-fold range in concentration. In subjects wearing the device for 24 h, the terminal half-life of fentanyl after removal of the device was 16 h. The bioavailability of transdermally administered fentanyl was 63 +/- 35% coefficient of variation. The rate of fentanyl absorption from 12-24 h ranged from 10 to 230 micrograms/h in subjects still wearing the device. In two subjects, the rate within the first 6 h briefly exceeded 300 micrograms/h. Both of these subjects demonstrated fentanyl toxicity, requiring early removal of the device.
CONCLUSIONS: The Cygnus transdermal fentanyl device shows great variability in the rate of fentanyl absorption, resulting in highly variable plasma fentanyl concentrations. Some persons may rapidly absorb fentanyl from the device in the first few hours after application, leading to fentanyl toxicity. The variability in effect of the Cygnus transdermal fentanyl device is appreciably greater than that reported for the currently available Duragesic transdermal fentanyl device, which is contraindicated for postoperative analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7661346     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199509000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  9 in total

1.  Comparative bioequivalence study between a novel matrix transdermal delivery system of fentanyl and a commercially available reservoir formulation.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Marier; Mary Lor; Josée Morin; Lionel Roux; Marika Di Marco; Gaetano Morelli; Eva Aggerholm Saedder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Bioequivalence criteria for transdermal fentanyl generics: do these need a relook?

Authors:  Carmen Walter; Lisa Felden; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Transdermal patches: history, development and pharmacology.

Authors:  Michael N Pastore; Yogeshvar N Kalia; Michael Horstmann; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Electrically modulated transdermal delivery of fentanyl.

Authors:  Rajkumar Conjeevaram; Ajay K Banga; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Passive drug diffusion via standardized skin mini-erosion; methodological aspects and clinical findings with new device.

Authors:  P Svedman; S Lundin; P Höglund; C Hammarlund; C Malmros; N Pantzar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil. An update.

Authors:  J Scholz; M Steinfath; M Schulz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of transdermal opioids: focus on transdermal fentanyl.

Authors:  S Grond; L Radbruch; K A Lehmann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Transdermal fentanyl: pharmacology and toxicology.

Authors:  Lewis Nelson; Robert Schwaner
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2009-12

Review 9.  Application of Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Drug Delivery: Development and Challenges.

Authors:  Huixi Zou; Parikshit Banerjee; Sharon Shui Yee Leung; Xiaoyu Yan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 5.810

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.