Literature DB >> 8896944

Clinical pharmacokinetics of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil. An update.

J Scholz1, M Steinfath, M Schulz.   

Abstract

Alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil are synthetic opioid analgesics acting at specific opioid receptors. These opioids are widely used as analgesics to supplement general anaesthesia for various surgical procedures or as primary anaesthetic agents in very high doses during cardiac surgery. Fentanyl and sufentanil especially are administered via infusion for long term analgesia and sedation in intensive care patients. Opioid analgesics are mainly administered using the intravenous route. However, other techniques of administration, including epidural, intrathecal, transdermal and intranasal applications, have been demonstrated. Important pharmacokinetic differences between alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil have been shown in many reports. Alfentanil has the most rapid analgesic onset and time to peak effect as well as the shortest distribution and elimination half-lives. The volume of distribution and total body clearance of this agent are smaller when compared with those of fentanyl and sufentanil. The pharmacokinetics of the opioid analgesics can be affected by several factors including patient age, plasma protein content, acid-base status and cardiopulmonary bypass, but not significantly by renal insufficiency or compensated hepatic dysfunction. In addition, pharmacokinetic properties can be influenced by changes in hepatic blood flow and administration of drug combinations which compete for the same plasma protein carrier or metabolising pathway. Although comparing specific pharmacokinetic parameters such as half-lives is deeply entrenched in the literature and clinical practice, simply comparing half-lives is not a rational way to select an opioid for specific requirements. Using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models, computer simulations based on changes in the effect site opioid concentration or context-sensitive half-times seem to be extremely useful for selecting an opioid on a more rational basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8896944     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199631040-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  111 in total

1.  Influence of gestational age on pharmacokinetics of alfentanil in neonates.

Authors:  A Killian; P J Davis; R L Stiller; R Cicco; D R Cook; R D Guthrie
Journal:  Dev Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Sufentanil. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  J P Monk; R Beresford; A Ward
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in adolescent patients with chronic renal failure.

Authors:  P J Davis; R L Stiller; D R Cook; B W Brandom; K A Davin-Robinson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Effects of age on plasma protein binding of sufentanil.

Authors:  C Meistelman; D Benhamou; J Barre; J C Levron; V Mahe; X Mazoit; C Ecoffey
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  pH-dependent accumulation of fentanyl, lofentanil and alfentanil by beating guinea pig atria.

Authors:  H Lüllmann; B S Martins; T Peters
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural sufentanil versus intravenous sufentanil or epidural fentanyl analgesia after major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  E Geller; J Chrubasik; R Graf; S Chrubasik; J Schulte-Mönting
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural versus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after thoracotomy.

Authors:  T E Salomäki; J O Laitinen; L S Nuutinen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Alfentanil pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  R J Hudson; I R Thomson; P M Burgess; M Rosenbloom
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 9.  Transdermal fentanyl: acute analgesic clinical studies.

Authors:  A Sandler
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  A comparison of intrathecal, epidural, and intravenous sufentanil for labor analgesia.

Authors:  W R Camann; R A Denney; E D Holby; S Datta
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Comparative tolerability of sedative agents in head-injured adults.

Authors:  Susan C Urwin; David K Menon
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Partial intravenous anesthesia in cats and dogs.

Authors:  Tanya Duke
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Sedation, analgesia, and monitoring.

Authors:  Travis F Wiggins; Abdul S Khan; Nathaniel S Winstead
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

Review 4.  How best to approach endoscopic sedation?

Authors:  Michaela Müller; Till Wehrmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Effects of fentanyl anesthesia and sufentanil anesthesia on regulatory T cells frequencies.

Authors:  Li Gong; Qian Qin; Lei Zhou; Wen Ouyang; Yanshuang Li; Yuhui Wu; Yunli Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-10-15

6.  Pupillometric Monitoring of Nociception in Cardiac Anesthesia.

Authors:  Felix Bartholmes; Nathalie M Malewicz; Melanie Ebel; Peter K Zahn; Christine H Meyer-Frießem
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Correction to: Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl and Its Derivatives in Children: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Victoria C Ziesenitz; Janelle D Vaughns; Gilbert Koch; Gerd Mikus; Johannes N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Obesity and acute lung injury.

Authors:  Jennifer W McCallister; Eric J Adkins; James M O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.878

Review 9.  Cholestasis and endogenous opioids: liver disease and exogenous opioid pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Mellar Davis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Opioids, cocaine, and food change runtime distribution in a rat runway procedure.

Authors:  Gudrun Wakonigg; Katja Sturm; Alois Saria; Gerald Zernig
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.