Literature DB >> 7661125

High- versus low-meat diets: effects on zinc absorption, iron status, and calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, nitrogen, phosphorus, and zinc balance in postmenopausal women.

J R Hunt1, S K Gallagher, L K Johnson, G I Lykken.   

Abstract

The effects of three diets--high meat (HM), low meat (LM), or low meat with mineral supplements (LS)--on zinc absorption, elemental balance, and related clinical indexes were investigated in a metabolic study of 14 women aged 51-70 y. The women ate each of the three diets for 7 wk in random order. Lean beef, chicken, ham, and tuna in the HM diet replaced foods with a low mineral content in the LM diet. The LS diet was similar to the HM diet in K, P, Fe, Mg, and Zn contents. Compared with the other diets, the HM diet increased zinc absorption and retention, and slightly increased urinary zinc. Nitrogen and calcium balances and urinary calcium were not different for the HM and LM diets. Iron balance was not different for the HM and LS diets with similar iron content, but the HM diet was unexpectedly associated with lower iron status (higher iron-binding capacity and lower ferritin than LM and LS diets). These results indicate that 0.8 g protein/kg body wt meets protein requirements in older women, and that high meat consumption increases zinc retention without compromising calcium status and may reduce indexes of iron status, in contrast with iron absorption results from studies with radiolabeled test meals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7661125     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/62.3.621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  15 in total

1.  Comparisons of vegetarian and beef-containing diets on hematological indexes and iron stores during a period of resistive training in older men.

Authors:  Amanda M Wells; Mark D Haub; James Fluckey; D Keith Williams; Ronni Chernoff; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2003-05

2.  The use of dysprosium to measure endogenous zinc excretion in feces eliminates the necessity of complete fecal collections.

Authors:  Leland V Miller; Xiao-Yang Sheng; K Michael Hambidge; Jamie E Westcott; Lei Sian; Nancy F Krebs
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 3.  Physiological requirements for zinc.

Authors:  K Michael Hambidge; Leland V Miller; Nancy F Krebs
Journal:  Int J Vitam Nutr Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.784

4.  Dietary determinants of post-menopausal bone loss at the lumbar spine: a possible beneficial effect of iron.

Authors:  R Abraham; J Walton; L Russell; R Wolman; B Wardley-Smith; J R Green; A Mitchell; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  A mathematical model of zinc absorption in humans as a function of dietary zinc and phytate.

Authors:  Leland V Miller; Nancy F Krebs; K Michael Hambidge
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Whey Protein Supplementation and Higher Total Protein Intake Do Not Influence Bone Quantity in Overweight and Obese Adults Following a 36-Week Exercise and Diet Intervention.

Authors:  Christian S Wright; Aoibheann M McMorrow; Eileen M Weinheimer-Haus; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Mathematical model of zinc absorption: effects of dietary calcium, protein and iron on zinc absorption.

Authors:  Leland V Miller; Nancy F Krebs; K Michael Hambidge
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.718

8.  Effects of Dietary Protein Quantity on Bone Quantity following Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christian S Wright; Jia Li; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

9.  Inclusion of guava enhances non-heme iron bioavailability but not fractional zinc absorption from a rice-based meal in adolescents.

Authors:  Krishnapillai Madhavan Nair; Ginnela N V Brahmam; Madhari S Radhika; Roy Choudhury Dripta; Punjal Ravinder; Nagalla Balakrishna; Zhensheng Chen; Keli M Hawthorne; Steven A Abrams
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  A metabolomics comparison of plant-based meat and grass-fed meat indicates large nutritional differences despite comparable Nutrition Facts panels.

Authors:  Stephan van Vliet; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Frederick D Provenza; Scott L Kronberg; Carl F Pieper; Kim M Huffman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.