Literature DB >> 16758136

Dietary determinants of post-menopausal bone loss at the lumbar spine: a possible beneficial effect of iron.

R Abraham1, J Walton, L Russell, R Wolman, B Wardley-Smith, J R Green, A Mitchell, J Reeve.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies suggesting different effects of diet on post-menopausal bone loss may have given conflicting results because they sometimes failed to exclude confounding conditions or used imprecise methodology.
DESIGN: To identify dietary determinants of bone loss from the lumbar spine after menopause in women not taking hormone replacement who developed no evidence of spondylotic or sclerotic degenerative disease, forty-three women were followed with repeated (mean = 12) measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) at L2-4 for 11-14 years. Eleven developed evidence suggestive of degenerative disease and were excluded. Diet was assessed at the beginning of the study and 2.5 years later using 3-day and 7-day periods of weighed intakes. Nutrients estimated were: carbohydrate, fat, protein, fibre, calcium, magnesium, iron, phosphorus, copper, zinc and six vitamins. We tested the ability of diet to predict post-menopausal bone loss using stepwise regression.
RESULTS: Each woman's BMD change was described by a single coefficient after log transformation of the BMD data. The best model for BMD loss including dietary factors alone had two significant determinants: daily energy or protein (p=0.0003) intake was adverse, while dietary iron (p=0.002) was predictive of bone maintenance, an effect that persisted if iron was expressed as a ratio to energy intake. Adding body mass index to the model increased the goodness of fit (R (2)adj rose from 0.33 to 0.42) without affecting the statistical significance of the dietary determinants.
CONCLUSIONS: Diet may influence bone loss after menopause, with dietary iron (or an associated factor) possibly having a protective effect on bone at the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16758136     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0033-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  34 in total

1.  Determinants of the first decade of bone loss after menopause at spine, hip and radius.

Authors:  J Reeve; J Walton; L J Russell; M Lunt; R Wolman; R Abraham; J Justice; A Nicholls; B Wardley-Smith; J R Green; A Mitchell
Journal:  QJM       Date:  1999-05

2.  Isoflavones, protein, and bone.

Authors:  Anthony Sebastian
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Perimenopausal appendicular bone loss: a 10-year prospective study.

Authors:  J A Falch; L Sandvik
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Risk factors for perimenopausal fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Huopio; H Kröger; R Honkanen; S Saarikoski; E Alhava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Quantitative computed tomography: update 1987.

Authors:  H K Genant; P Steiger; J E Block; C C Glueer; B Ettinger; S T Harris
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  McCance and Widdowson's 'The composition of foods': supplementary information and review of new compositional data.

Authors:  A A Paul; D A Southgate; D H Buss
Journal:  Hum Nutr Appl Nutr       Date:  1986-08

7.  Uncritical use of bone mineral density in absorptiometry may lead to size-related artifacts in the identification of bone mineral determinants.

Authors:  A Prentice; T J Parsons; T J Cole
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  The effects of lifestyle, dietary dairy intake and diabetes on bone density and vertebral deformity prevalence: the EVOS study.

Authors:  M Lunt; P Masaryk; C Scheidt-Nave; J Nijs; G Poor; H Pols; J A Falch; G Hammermeister; D M Reid; L Benevolenskaya; K Weber; J Cannata; T W O'Neill; D Felsenberg; A J Silman; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bone density and hemoglobin levels in older persons: results from the InCHIANTI study.

Authors:  Matteo Cesari; Marco Pahor; Fulvio Lauretani; Brenda W H J Penninx; Benedetta Bartali; Roberto Russo; Antonio Cherubini; Richard Woodman; Stefania Bandinelli; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Effect of calcium supplementation on bone loss in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  I R Reid; R W Ames; M C Evans; G D Gamble; S J Sharpe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  13 in total

1.  Total and regional bone mineral content in healthy Spanish subjects by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  S Aguado Henche; R Rodríguez Torres; C Clemente de Arriba; L Gómez Pellico
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Effects of Iron on Physical and Mechanical Properties, and Osteoblast Cell Interaction in β-Tricalcium Phosphate.

Authors:  Sahar Vahabzadeh; Susmita Bose
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Serum fibroblast growth factor 23, serum iron and bone mineral density in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Erik A Imel; Ziyue Liu; Amie K McQueen; Dena Acton; Anthony Acton; Leah R Padgett; Munro Peacock; Michael J Econs
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Copper, iron, and selenium dietary deficiencies negatively impact skeletal integrity: A review.

Authors:  Denis M Medeiros
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-05-05

5.  Wnt5a is a key target for the pro-osteogenic effects of iron chelation on osteoblast progenitors.

Authors:  Ulrike Baschant; Martina Rauner; Ekaterina Balaian; Heike Weidner; Antonella Roetto; Uwe Platzbecker; Lorenz C Hofbauer
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Dietary magnesium intake, bone mineral density and risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Farsinejad-Marj; P Saneei; A Esmaillzadeh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Intrinsically superparamagnetic Fe-hydroxyapatite nanoparticles positively influence osteoblast-like cell behaviour.

Authors:  Silvia Panseri; Carla Cunha; Teresa D'Alessandro; Monica Sandri; Gianluca Giavaresi; Maurilio Marcacci; Clark T Hung; Anna Tampieri
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 8.  Vertebral body integrity: a review of various anatomical factors involved in the lumbar region.

Authors:  L V Prabhu; V V Saralaya; M M Pai; A V Ranade; G Singh; S Madhyastha
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 5.071

9.  Copper deficit as a potential pathogenic factor of reduced bone mineral density and severe tooth wear.

Authors:  T Sierpinska; J Konstantynowicz; K Orywal; M Golebiewska; M Szmitkowski
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The use of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for prosthetic biofilm prevention.

Authors:  Erik N Taylor; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2009-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.