Literature DB >> 7660599

Printed cards for measuring low-vision reading speed.

S J Ahn1, G E Legge, A Luebker.   

Abstract

There is a growing consensus that clinical evaluation of the real-world consequences of eye disease requires new performance-based tests. This is because Snellen acuity and other common clinical tests are often poor predictors of everyday function. Ahn and Legge [(1995) Vision Research, 35, 1931-1938] validated a computerized test of reading speed by showing that it provides an accurate prediction of low-vision reading performance with magnifiers. Here, we describe development of a printed-card version of the test suitable for clinical use. This printed-card test retains key design features of the validated computerized test, including the same set of sentences and display format. Data from 23 low-vision subjects showed that a very simple testing procedure using printed cards and a stop watch could be used effectively to estimate reading speed. Reading speed based on a single card was quite accurate (SD equal to about 18% of the mean) and showed no practice effects from one card to the next. Reading speeds obtained with printed cards correlated highly (r = 0.887) with those from computerized testing. We conclude that a simple test, using printed cards, can be used to obtain useful estimates of low-vision reading speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7660599     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00294-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  22 in total

1.  Reliability of a standardized reading chart system: variance component analysis, test-retest and inter-chart reliability.

Authors:  Eva Stifter; Franz König; Thomas Lang; Peter Bauer; Sibylla Richter-Müksch; Michaela Velikay-Parel; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Effects of yellow filters on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and reading under conditions of forward light scatter.

Authors:  Frank Eperjesi; Lillian Evangelica Agelis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Reading with optical magnifiers: page navigation strategies and difficulties.

Authors:  Alex Bowers; Allen M Y Cheong; Jan E Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  New standardised texts for assessing reading performance in four European languages.

Authors:  G A Hahn; D Penka; C Gehrlich; A Messias; M Weismann; L Hyvärinen; M Leinonen; M Feely; G Rubin; C Dauxerre; F Vital-Durand; S Featherston; K Dietz; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Macular degeneration: do conventional measurements of impaired visual function equate with visual disability?

Authors:  M E McClure; P M Hart; A J Jackson; M R Stevenson; U Chakravarthy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Differences in reading performance of patients with Drusen maculopathy and subretinal fibrosis after CNV.

Authors:  Sibylla Richter-Mueksch; Michael Stur; Eva Stifter; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Monocular and binocular reading performance in children with microstrabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  E Stifter; G Burggasser; E Hirmann; A Thaler; W Radner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 8.  Reading aids for adults with low vision.

Authors:  Gianni Virgili; Ruthy Acosta; Lori L Grover; Sharon A Bentley; Giovanni Giacomelli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-23

Review 9.  Optical reading aids for children and young people with low vision.

Authors:  Lucy Barker; Rachel Thomas; Gary Rubin; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-04

10.  Reading speed in the peripheral visual field of older adults: Does it benefit from perceptual learning?

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Sing-Hang Cheung; Gordon E Legge; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.