Literature DB >> 7656151

Clinical comparison of the XPERT non-contact tonometer and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer.

M K Hansen1.   

Abstract

Intraocular pressure (IOP) in the right eye of 113 patients was measured with one XPERT NCT air-puff non-contact tonometer (XPERT) and compared with IOP measured with one Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Precision of the methods was judged by variance analysis, indicating that GAT was slightly more precise than XPERT. The slope of the linear relationship between the methods did not differ significantly from 1.0. Mean difference between the methods was 0.92 mmHg, XPERT measuring lower than GAT, p = 0.00017. The intra-individual difference between methods ranged from -8.00 to 8.67 mmHg, and standard deviation (SD) of differences was 2.52 mmHg. The 95% limits of agreement between the two methods were -5.85 to 4.01 mmHg. The SD of differences is of approximately the same size as previous XPERT vs GAT as well as previous GAT vs GAT studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7656151     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1995.tb00664.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand        ISSN: 1395-3907


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness.

Authors:  M E Iliev; D Goldblum; K Katsoulis; C Amstutz; B Frueh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Sarwat Salim; Daniel J Linn; James R Echols; Peter A Netland
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-02

4.  Evaluation of applanation resonator sensors for intra-ocular pressure measurement: results from clinical and in vitro studies.

Authors:  A Eklund; C Lindén; T Bäcklund; B M Andersson; O A Lindahl
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Comparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects.

Authors:  Seung Pil Bang; Chong Eun Lee; Yu Cheol Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients.

Authors:  Girish Velis; Srinivasan Kavitha; Nazlee Zebardast; Sabyasachi Sengupta; Rengaraj Venkatesh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.848

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.