Literature DB >> 10450665

Research ethics committees: a regional approach.

C C Macpherson1.   

Abstract

Guidelines for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) or research ethics committees exist at national and international levels. These guidelines are based on ethical principles and establish an internationally acceptable standard for the review and conduct of medical research. Having attained a multinational consensus about what these fundamental guidelines should be, IRBs are left to interpret the guidelines and devise their own means of implementing them. Individual and community values bear on the interpretation of the guidelines so different IRBs attain different levels of effectiveness. In the Caribbean and Pan American regions there are few IRBs. Obstacles to the establishment and function of IRBs are exacerbated in developing regions like these by differences in language, literacy, and local value systems; education, administrative expertise, facilities, and access to information are also limited. A regional IRB network might facilitate more uniform ethical review in developing countries, and simplify IRB procedures.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10450665     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009989104496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  23 in total

1.  The "best proven therapeutic method" standard in clinical trials in technologically developing countries.

Authors:  Robert J Levine
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

2.  The governance of clinical trials.

Authors:  A D Sniderman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Research ethics. NIH examines standards for consent.

Authors:  E Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Abandoning informed consent.

Authors:  R M Veatch
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Local research ethics committees and multicentre drug trials.

Authors:  R P Dear
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-18

6.  [Informed consent and the approval of evaluation committees in Mexican medical research].

Authors:  X A López-de-la-Peña
Journal:  Rev Invest Clin       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.451

7.  Reflections of an IRB chair.

Authors:  K C Micetich
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Modified informed consent in a viral seroprevalence study in the Caribbean.

Authors:  Cheryl Cox; CNL Macpherson
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.898

9.  Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation. Benefit or harm?

Authors:  J A Carrese; L A Rhodes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Auditing a research ethics committee.

Authors:  J B Cookson
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1992-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Ethical oversight of public health research: can rules and IRBs make a difference in developing countries?

Authors:  Leslie London
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  The current state of clinical ethics and healthcare ethics committees in Belgium.

Authors:  T Meulenbergs; J Vermylen; P T Schotsmans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Ethics committees in Croatia in the healthcare institutions: the first study about their structure and functions, and some reflections on the major issues and problems.

Authors:  Ana Borovecki; Henk ten Have; Stjepan Oresković
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2006-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.