Literature DB >> 7643051

Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies.

M Eimer1.   

Abstract

Effects of dimensional overlap between stimuli and responses on partial response activation were investigated within a priming paradigm with the help of event-related potentials. The likely position of a target stimulus (requiring a left or a right reaction) was indicated by an arrow precue. To test whether automatic response activation processes are triggered by the cue, the lateralized readiness potential was computed. It was found that responses congruent to the direction of the cue were activated about 200 ms after cue onset. This early process was unaffected by specific cue-response contingencies and was completely missing when a nonspatial (color) cue was used. A second response activation phase was observed, which was partially controlled by specific response instructions and subjective expectancies. It is concluded that when stimuli and responses overlap with respect to spatial attributes, automatic response activation process are triggered, which may later be replaced by the activation of an expected response.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7643051     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.4.837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  44 in total

1.  Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Kim-Phuong L Vu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

2.  Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials.

Authors:  Uwe Mattler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Attentional and intentional cueing in a Simon task: an EEG-based approach.

Authors:  Edmund Wascher; M Wolber
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-05-15

4.  EEG activity related to preparation and suppression of eye movements in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Areti Tzelepi; Antoine Lutz; Zoi Kapoula
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning.

Authors:  O V Lungu; T Wächter; T Liu; D T Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Role of stimulus and response feature overlap in between-task logical recoding.

Authors:  Barbara Treccani; Luca Ronconi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-08

7.  Can the location negative priming process operate in a proactive manner?

Authors:  Eric Buckolz; Sarah Guy; Michael Khan; Gavin Lawrence
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-02-05

8.  Mechanisms underlying spatial coding in a multiple-item Simon task.

Authors:  Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Piotr Jaśkowski; Rolf Verleger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-01

9.  Automatic and imperative motor activations in stimulus-response compatibility: magnetoencephalographic analysis of upper and lower limbs.

Authors:  Yuichiro Kato; Hiroshi Endo; Tomohiro Kizuka; Takaaki Asami
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Compatibility effects based on stimulus and response numerosity.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Stephen G Atkins; Fenna Van Nes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.