Literature DB >> 7641014

Stereotactic breast biopsy as an alternative to open excisional biopsy.

M J Cross1, W P Evans, G N Peters, J H Cheek, R C Jones, P Krakos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care cost continues to play a dominant role in our society. Technological advances are expensive, with the possible exception of stereotactic breast biopsy. We must learn other alternatives that give the same diagnostic accuracy at lower cost. The intention of this study was to find other acceptable alternatives to open excisional breast biopsies.
METHODS: Patients were referred to Baylor University Medical Center between May 1990 and June 1992 for stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. Before stereotactic biopsy, lesions were categorized into low or high suspicion for malignancy based on screening mammography. Slides were reviewed by a pathologist and the histological diagnosis was compared with mammographic characterization. Benign histology confirming the low-suspicion mammographic abnormality demonstrated mammographic and histologic correlation. Mammographic follow-up was recommended.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five women underwent 250 stereotactic breast biopsies. Malignancy was diagnosed in 47 patients; the remaining 203 lesions were benign on pathological examination and are being followed regularly. Seventy-eight percent of the lesions were characterized as low suspicion for malignancy, and 22% were characterized as high suspicion. The average cost savings per lesion using stereotactic biopsy was $1,629.
CONCLUSION: Stereotactic breast biopsy is an acceptable, less expensive alternative to open excisional biopsy for diagnosing nonpalpable mammographic findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7641014     DOI: 10.1007/bf02307023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  24 in total

1.  Needle core biopsy of the breast with a spring-loaded device.

Authors:  A J McMahon; A M Lutfy; A Matthew; A D Walls; J S McOrmick; M A Henderson; C D Auld
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Stereotactic, X-ray guided, fine needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: comparison with the coordinate grid localization technique.

Authors:  M Löfgren; I Andersson; K Lindholm
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1990

3.  Recurrent breast cancer: stereotaxic localization for fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Work in progress.

Authors:  J S Mitnick; M F Vazquez; D F Roses; M N Harris; S Schechter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A prospective study of double diagnosis of nonpalpable lesions of the breast.

Authors:  K Dowlatshahi; P M Jokich; L F Kluskens; R Patel; S G Economou
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1991-02

5.  Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis.

Authors:  J G Tinnemans; T Wobbes; R Holland; J H Hendriks; R F van der Sluis; E J Lubbers; H H de Boer
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987-12

6.  Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report.

Authors:  L H Baker
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Stereotactic fine-needle biopsy in 2594 mammographically detected non-palpable lesions.

Authors:  E Azavedo; G Svane; G Auer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  The status of mammographically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  V P Jackson
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Mammographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Can it replace open biopsy?

Authors:  L J Layfield; B Parkinson; J Wong; A E Giuliano; L W Bassett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  History of the Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center.

Authors:  Marvin J Stone; Billie E Aronoff; W Phil Evans; Joseph W Fay; Z H Lieberman; Carolyn M Matthews; George J Race; R Pickett Scruggs; C Allen Stringer
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

2.  Stereotactic breast biopsy.

Authors:  T A Gaskin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Touch Imprint Cytology and Stereotactically-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Lesions: 15-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P A Fasching; M R Bani; M P Lux; S Jud; C Rauh; C Bayer; D L Wachter; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann; M Uder; C R Loehberg
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Mammographically detected breast cancer. Benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy.

Authors:  J H Yim; P Barton; B Weber; D Radford; J Levy; B Monsees; F Flanagan; J A Norton; G M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.