Literature DB >> 7639466

Cholesteatoma surgery: the individualized technique.

S Karmarkar, S Bhatia, E Saleh, G DeDonato, A Taibah, A Russo, M Sanna.   

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of 433 cholesteatoma cases, surgically treated at the Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Italy, over a 7-year period, is reported. The purpose of this study was to delineate actual indications for individualizing open and closed procedures and to compare their results as regards residual or recurrent disease and hearing. The total incidences of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma in the open cavity procedures were 10% and 2.38%, respectively, while the closed procedures showed higher incidences of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma: 31.22% and 11.16%, respectively. The problem of a persistently discharging cavity was encountered in only 1 case of an open procedure, while 2 patients had persistent otorrhea among the closed cavity cases. The hearing results, although slightly better in the closed procedures, were not significantly different from those in the open procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7639466     DOI: 10.1177/000348949510400801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  11 in total

1.  Reconstruction of outer attic wall defects using bone paté: Long-term clinical and histological evaluation.

Authors:  Andrea Bacciu; Enrico Pasanisi; Vincenzo Vincenti; Filippo Di Lella; Salvatore Bacciu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Evaluation of using Bioglass® in obliteration of mastoid cavity.

Authors:  Abdelrahman E M Ezzat; Mustafa I Eid
Journal:  Curr Sci Int       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

3.  Ears with Cholesteatoma: Outcomes of Canal Wall Up and Down Tympano-Mastoidectomies-A Comparative Prospective Study.

Authors:  Mehtab Alam; Kamlesh Chandra
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-18

4.  Epitympanoplasty with cartilage obliteration in the preservation of posterior canal wall: a technique for surgical treatment of attic cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Jianjun Sun; Danheng Zhao; Yongsheng Lin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Giant Cholesteatoma: Recommendations for Follow-up.

Authors:  Leontien I Geven; Jef J S Mulder; Kees Graamans
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2008-09

6.  Canal wall reconstruction in cholesteatoma surgeries: rate of residual.

Authors:  A Roux; D Bakhos; E Lescanne; J-P Cottier; A Robier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Silastic sheeting in staged ear surgery: Is there still a role for this procedure?

Authors:  Martin Müller; Flurin Honegger; Mihael Podvinec; Frank Metternich; Nicolas Gürtler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma.

Authors:  David L Choi; Michael K Gupta; Ryan Rebello; Jason D Archibald
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-11-07

9.  The value of otoendoscopy in the management of middle ear cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Sayed Hamidreza Abtahi; Farzaneh Abootalebian; Mehrdad Rogha; Nezamoddin Berjis
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Outcomes of Modified Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy and Mastoid Obliteration Using Autologous Materials.

Authors:  Bo Gyung Kim; Hyo Jun Kim; Seung Jae Lee; Eunsang Lee; Se A Lee; Jong Dae Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.