Literature DB >> 33760955

Silastic sheeting in staged ear surgery: Is there still a role for this procedure?

Martin Müller1, Flurin Honegger2, Mihael Podvinec3, Frank Metternich1, Nicolas Gürtler4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review long-term outcomes for chronic otitis media with and without cholesteatoma in staged canal-wall-up tympanoplasty with temporary silastic sheeting and to compare hearing and recurrence results with the literature.
METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of all patients suffering from chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma (COMC/COM) and treated by staged canal-wall-up (CWU) technique with silastic insertion between 1992 and 2012. Literature analysis in PubMed 1990-2017.
RESULTS: 74 cases were included in the analysis. In COMC (n = 47) a total of 2 (4%) recurrent and 14 (30%) residual cholesteatoma were documented. The postoperative hearing test showed a pure-tone-average (PTA) of 36 dB hearing level (HL) and an air-bone-gap (ABG) of 21 dB HL. A significant improvement was only observed for stage I disease (PTA 8 dB HL and ABG 9 dB HL). In COM (n = 27) postoperative PTA and ABG were significantly improved by 33 dB HL and 23 dB HL, respectively. Mean postoperative follow-up was 47 months (12-173) for COMC and 22 months (2-120) for COM.
CONCLUSIONS: The cholesteatoma recurrence rate in this study reflects contemporary published rates. Assessment of hearing outcome is difficult due to the low number of cases and very high heterogeneity of published data. Still, the staged CWU procedure with temporary silastic sheeting seems to bear some advantages in regard to hearing. The role of additional factors such as Eustachian Tube function to assess outcome should be considered. An internationally agreed upon reporting system should be followed, if various surgical approaches are to be compared. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canal-wall-up tympanoplasty; Cholesteatoma; Cholesteatoma surgery; Silastic sheeting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33760955     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06744-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

Review 1.  Tympanoplasty: to stage or not to stage.

Authors:  J L Sheehy; C Shelton
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Acoustic mechanisms: canal wall-up versus canal wall-down mastoidectomy.

Authors:  K R Whittemore; S N Merchant; J J Rosowski
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for residual and recurrent cholesteatoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Muzaffar; C Metcalfe; S Colley; C Coulson
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Residue of middle ear cholesteatoma after intact canal wall tympanoplasty: surgical findings at one year.

Authors:  K Gyo; Y Sasaki; Y Hinohira; N Yanagihara
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 5.  EAONO/JOS Joint Consensus Statements on the Definitions, Classification and Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Matthew Yung; Tetsuya Tono; Ewa Olszewska; Yutaka Yamamoto; Holger Sudhoff; Masafumi Sakagami; Jef Mulder; Hiromi Kojima; Armağan İncesulu; Franco Trabalzini; Nuri Özgirgin
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.017

6.  Surgical technique and recurrence in cholesteatoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julia Tomlin; David Chang; Brandon McCutcheon; Jeffrey Harris
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  The investigation of the recurrence rate of cholesteatoma using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Authors:  Yasuo Mishiro; Masafumi Sakagami; Tadashi Kitahara; Kazumasa Kondoh; Shin-ichi Okumura
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Comparing diffusion weighted MRI in the detection of post-operative middle ear cholesteatoma in children and adults.

Authors:  Robert Nash; Phui Yee Wong; Ali Kalan; Ravi K Lingam; Arvind Singh
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Superiority of Second Stage Ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  Ji Hyung Lim; Jung Mee Park; Jung Ju Han; Seon Ik Kim; So Young Park; Shi Nae Park
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 10.  Results of endoscopic middle ear surgery for cholesteatoma treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Presutti; F M Gioacchini; M Alicandri-Ciufelli; D Villari; D Marchioni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.