Literature DB >> 25227760

Canal wall reconstruction in cholesteatoma surgeries: rate of residual.

A Roux1, D Bakhos, E Lescanne, J-P Cottier, A Robier.   

Abstract

To evaluate the rates of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma following canal wall reconstruction (CWR) tympano-mastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration, for the treatment of chronic otitis with cholesteatoma. Consecutive cohort study. We included patients following surgical cholesteatoma removal by CWR tympano-mastoidectomy with hydroxyapatite mastoid obliteration from 2008 to 2012. We analyzed audiometric and postoperative radiologic data. We determined the rates of residual disease and recurrence, and evaluated postoperative complications. Thirty-six ears were included in this study. The mean follow-up after surgery was 24 months (range 12.3-51.4 months). The recurrence rate was 3.1% (one case) and the rate of residual disease was 6.2% (two cases including one of iatrogenic cholesteatoma). No canal-wall-down tympanoplasty was required. Local infection was detected in 33% of cases and was successfully treated with appropriate antibiotics. Postoperative audiometry showed no impairment of the cochlear reserve. No postoperative facial palsy or deafness was observed. CWR permits well exposure of the lesion, making complete excision of the cholesteatoma possible. This study showed a decreasing of the rate of residual cholesteatoma and must be confirmed with further studies. CWR makes it possible to use hearing aids for auditory rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25227760     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3280-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  41 in total

1.  Use of mastoid obliteration techniques in cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Matthew Yung; Alex Bennett
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Temporary removal of the posterior bony canal wall with reconstruction using microplate osteosynthesis in cholesteatoma surgery: a case series and description of the technique.

Authors:  Karen Van der Gucht; Vincent Van Rompaey; Olivier Vanderveken; Paul Van de Heyning; Jos Claes
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A randomized, blinded study of canal wall up versus canal wall down mastoidectomy determining the differences in viewing middle ear anatomy and pathology.

Authors:  G F Hulka; J T McElveen
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-09

4.  Rehabilitation of canal wall down mastoidectomy using a titanium ear canal implant.

Authors:  Arnaud Deveze; Charbel Rameh; Mélanie Sanjuan Puchol; Benoît Lafont; Jean-Pierre Lavieille; Jacques Magnan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Long-term follow up after bony mastoid and epitympanic obliteration: radiological findings.

Authors:  J-P Vercruysse; B De Foer; T Somers; J Casselman; E Offeciers
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Tympanoplasty with intact canal wall mastoidectomy for cholesteatoma: long-term surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Kevin F Wilson; Ryan N Hoggan; Clough Shelton
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Reversible canal wall down mastoidectomy for acquired cholesteatomas: preliminary results.

Authors:  John T McElveen; Andy T A Chung
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  Cholesteatoma surgery: the individualized technique.

Authors:  S Karmarkar; S Bhatia; E Saleh; G DeDonato; A Taibah; A Russo; M Sanna
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Detection of postoperative relapsing/residual cholesteatomas with diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Alessandro Stasolla; Giuseppe Magliulo; Donato Parrotto; Giacomo Luppi; Mario Marini
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Value of high-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of residual cholesteatomas in primary bony obliterated mastoids.

Authors:  Bert De Foer; Jean-Philippe Vercruysse; Marc Pouillon; Thomas Somers; Jan W Casselman; Erwin Offeciers
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.808

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mastoid obliteration with hydroxyapatite vs. bone pâté in mastoidectomy surgery performed on patients with cholesteatoma and chronic suppurative otitis media: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jantine J Lindeboom; P M W van Kempen; J Buwalda; B O Westerlaken; D A van Zuijlen; S J H Bom; F B van der Beek
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.236

2.  Cost-comparison analysis of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) versus second look surgery for the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma.

Authors:  David L Choi; Michael K Gupta; Ryan Rebello; Jason D Archibald
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-11-07

3.  Hearing and hearing rehabilitation after obliteration of troublesome mastoid cavities.

Authors:  Simon Geerse; Tim J M Bost; Samira Allagul; Maarten J F de Wolf; Fenna A Ebbens; Erik van Spronsen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Mastoid obliteration and reconstruction techniques: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Michelle Lupa Mendlovic; Daniella Alejandra Monroy Llaguno; Ivan Hermann Schobert Capetillo; Juan Carlos Cisneros Lesser
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-01-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.