Literature DB >> 7637403

Diagnosis-related group refinement with diagnosis- and procedure-specific comorbidities and complications.

J L Freeman1, R B Fetter, H Park, K C Schneider, J L Lichtenstein, J S Hughes, W A Bauman, C C Duncan, D H Freeman, G R Palmer.   

Abstract

Diagnosis-related groups have been revised through more refined uses of secondary diagnoses. Under the refined diagnosis-related groups, patients are distinguished with respect to classes of secondary diagnoses that are disease- and procedure-specific. Each class represents a different level of utilization for a given principal diagnosis or surgical procedure. The refined system was evaluated with national data from the Medicare program. Estimates of hospital costs and utilization based on refined diagnosis-related groups were more precise than those based on unrefined diagnosis-related groups. This approach to diagnosis-related group refinement does not represent a radical departure from the current diagnosis-related group framework and does not require new data collection efforts. Moreover, a payment system based on the refined model is less affected by the ordering of the diagnoses than under the existing diagnosis-related group system. How the refined diagnosis-related group framework can accommodate future refinements at all levels of the classification scheme is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7637403     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199508000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  13 in total

1.  Hospitalists and an innovative emergency department admission process.

Authors:  Eric E Howell; Edward S Bessman; Haya R Rubin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Measuring case-mix complexity of tertiary care hospitals using DRGs.

Authors:  Hayoung Park; Youngsoo Shin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-02

Review 3.  How severity measures rate hospitalized patients.

Authors:  J S Hughes; L I Iezzoni; J Daley; L Greenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Judging hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality rates: the influence of the severity-adjustment method.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; M Shwartz; J Daley; J S Hughes; Y D Mackiernan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Do severity measures explain differences in length of hospital stay? The case of hip fracture.

Authors:  M Shwartz; L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; Y D Mackiernan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Predicting outcome after appendicectomy.

Authors:  M R Kell; K Power; D C Winter; C Power; C Shields; W O Kirwan; H P Redmond
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Uncomplicated acute renal failure and post-hospital care: a not so uncomplicated illness.

Authors:  Michael J Fischer; Bradley B Brimhall; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.754

8.  Advanced age and sex as predictors of adverse outcomes following gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Yannis Raftopoulos; Guido G Gatti; James D Luketich; Anita P Courcoulas
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Relating illness complexity to reimbursement in CKD patients.

Authors:  Russell W Bessette; Randy L Carter
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2011-09-19

10.  An Epidemiological Study of Anemia and Renal Dysfunction in Patients Admitted to ICUs across the United States.

Authors:  Donald F Brophy; Spencer E Harpe; Daniel E Carl; Gretchen M Brophy
Journal:  Anemia       Date:  2012-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.