Literature DB >> 8885854

Do severity measures explain differences in length of hospital stay? The case of hip fracture.

M Shwartz1, L I Iezzoni, A S Ash, Y D Mackiernan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether judgments about hospital length of stay (LOS) vary depending on the measure used to adjust for severity differences. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Data on admissions to 80 hospitals nationwide in the 1992 MedisGroups Comparative Database. STUDY
DESIGN: For each of 14 severity measures, LOS was regressed on patient age/sex, DRG, and severity score. Regressions were performed on trimmed and untrimmed data. R-squared was used to evaluate model performance. For each severity measure for each hospital, we calculated the expected LOS and the z-score, a measure of the deviation of observed from expected LOS. We ranked hospitals by z-scores. DATA EXTRACTION: All patients admitted for initial surgical repair of a hip fracture, defined by DRG, diagnosis, and procedure codes. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The 5,664 patients had a mean (s.d.) LOS of 11.9 (8.9) days. Cross-validated R-squared values from the multivariable regressions (trimmed data) ranged from 0.041 (Comorbidity Index) to 0.165 (APR-DRGs). Using untrimmed data, observed average LOS for hospitals ranged from 7.6 to 23.9 days. The 14 severity measures showed excellent agreement in ranking hospitals based on z-scores. No severity measure explained the differences between hospitals with the shortest and longest LOS.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals differed widely in their mean LOS for hip fracture patients, and severity adjustment did little to explain these differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8885854      PMCID: PMC1070127     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  41 in total

1.  Development of clinical and economic prognoses from Medicare claims data.

Authors:  G Anderson; E P Steinberg; J Whittle; N R Powe; S Antebi; R Herbert
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Admission and mid-stay MedisGroups scores as predictors of death within 30 days of hospital admission.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; G Coffman; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Risk adjustment in claims-based research: the search for efficient approaches.

Authors:  L L Roos; S M Sharp; M M Cohen; A Wajda
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Refining case-mix adjustment. The research evidence.

Authors:  S F Jencks; A Dobson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The problem of late hospitalization: a quality and cost issue.

Authors:  J S Gonnella; D Z Louis; C Zeleznik; B J Turner
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  A clinical assessment of MedisGroups.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-12-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  The use of large data bases in health care studies.

Authors:  F A Connell; P Diehr; L G Hart
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 21.981

9.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

10.  Diagnosis-related group refinement with diagnosis- and procedure-specific comorbidities and complications.

Authors:  J L Freeman; R B Fetter; H Park; K C Schneider; J L Lichtenstein; J S Hughes; W A Bauman; C C Duncan; D H Freeman; G R Palmer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  7 in total

1.  Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls.

Authors:  A E Powell; H T O Davies; R G Thomson
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

2.  High cost factors for leukaemia and lymphoma patients: a new analysis of costs within these diagnosis related groups.

Authors:  C Quantin; F Entezam; P Brunet-Lecomte; E Lepage; H Guy; L Dusserre
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Length of stay and imminent discharge probability distributions from multistage models: variation by diagnosis, severity of illness, and hospital.

Authors:  Gary W Harrison; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2010-09

4.  Concurrent prediction of hospital mortality and length of stay from risk factors on admission.

Authors:  David E Clark; Louise M Ryan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Comorbidity risk-adjustment strategies are comparable among persons with hip fracture.

Authors:  David C Radley; Daniel J Gottlieb; Elliot S Fisher; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Hip Fractures: Therapy, Timing, and Complication Spectrum.

Authors:  Dominik Saul; Juliane Riekenberg; Jan C Ammon; Daniel B Hoffmann; Stephan Sehmisch
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Utilization Patterns of IV Iron and Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents in Anemic Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Multihospital Study.

Authors:  Avani D Joshi; David A Holdford; Donald F Brophy; Spencer E Harpe; Darcy Mays; Todd W B Gehr
Journal:  Anemia       Date:  2012-04-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.