Literature DB >> 15009782

Hospitalists and an innovative emergency department admission process.

Eric E Howell1, Edward S Bessman, Haya R Rubin.   

Abstract

After treatment in an emergency department (ED), patients often wait several hours for hospital admission, resulting in dissatisfaction and increased wait times for both admitted and other ED patients. We implemented a new direct admission system based on telephone consultation between ED physicians and in-house hospitalists. We studied this system, measuring admission times, length of stay, and mortality. Postintervention, admission times averaged 18 minutes for transfer to the ward compared to 2.5 hours preintervention, while pre- and postintervention length of stay and mortality rates remained similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15009782      PMCID: PMC1492152          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30431.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  8 in total

1.  Trends in emergency department utilization, 1988-1997.

Authors:  W J Meggs; T Czaplijski; N Benson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Diagnosis-related group refinement with diagnosis- and procedure-specific comorbidities and complications.

Authors:  J L Freeman; R B Fetter; H Park; K C Schneider; J L Lichtenstein; J S Hughes; W A Bauman; C C Duncan; D H Freeman; G R Palmer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Time analysis of consult service emergency department admission process compared with emergency medicine service admission process.

Authors:  G Quick
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 4.  The hospitalist movement 5 years later.

Authors:  Robert M Wachter; Lee Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 Jan 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Do admitted patients held in the emergency department impact the throughput of treat-and-release patients?

Authors:  J J Bazarian; S M Schneider; V J Newman; J Chodosh
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Emergency department crowding: a point in time.

Authors:  Sandra M Schneider; Michael E Gallery; Robert Schafermeyer; Frank L Zwemer
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Emergency departments and crowding in United States teaching hospitals.

Authors:  D P Andrulis; A Kellermann; E A Hintz; B B Hackman; V B Weslowski
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Emergency department contributors to ambulance diversion: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Schull; Kate Lazier; Marian Vermeulen; Shawn Mawhinney; Laurie J Morrison
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.721

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Outcomes of a Neurohospitalist Program at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Carl A Gold; Brian J Scott; Yingjie Weng; Eric Bernier; Kathryn A Kvam
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2022-04-22

2.  Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Dominic Jones; Allan Cameron; David J Lowe; Suzanne M Mason; Colin A O'Keeffe; Eilidh Logan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Admission Decisions Made by Emergency Physicians Can Reduce the Emergency Department Length of Stay for Medical Patients.

Authors:  Yuri Choi; Jinwoo Jeong; Byoung-Gwon Kim
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 1.112

4.  A simple tool to predict admission at the time of triage.

Authors:  Allan Cameron; Kenneth Rodgers; Alastair Ireland; Ravi Jamdar; Gerard A McKay
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 2.740

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.