Literature DB >> 7636539

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the multidrug resistance modulator dexverapamil with EPOCH chemotherapy.

W H Wilson1, C Jamis-Dow, G Bryant, F M Balis, R W Klecker, S E Bates, B A Chabner, S M Steinberg, D R Kohler, R E Wittes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dexverapamil is a competitive inhibitor of the P-glycoprotein (Pgp) efflux pump, a potent mechanism of multidrug resistance (mdr-1) in vitro. We performed a phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of dexverapamil with etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (EPOCH) chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had relapsed or refractory lymphoma or sarcoma. Patients initially received EPOCH alone, and those with stable or progressive disease were crossed-over to received dexverapamil on subsequent cycles of EPOCH. Dexverapamil was administered orally for 6 days and escalated over eight dose levels ranging from 240 to 1,200 mg/m2/d. Pharmacokinetics of dexverapamil and its active metabolite, nor-dexverapamil, were obtained in most patients. In seven patients, pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin, doxorubicinol, and etoposide were determined on paired cycles of EPOCH with or without dexverapamil.
RESULTS: Sixty-five patients received 130 cycles of dexverapamil/EPOCH chemotherapy. The MTD of dexverapamil was 150 mg/m2 every 4 hours (900 mg/m2/d), and hypotension was the principal dose-limiting toxicity. The dexverapamil area under the curve (AUC) increased proportionally with dexverapamil dose, but significant interpatient variation occurred. At the MTD, the median plasma average concentrations of dexverapamil and nor-dexverapamil were 1.2 and 1.4 mumol/L, respectively. Dexverapamil did not affect the steady-state concentration (Css) of etoposide, but increased the Css of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol nearly twofold. The absolute neutrophil and platelet nadirs were significantly lower on the dexverapamil cycles compared with cycles of EPOCH alone, but other chemotherapy-related toxicities did not change.
CONCLUSION: The phase II recommended dose of dexverapamil with EPOCH is 150 mg/m2 every 4 hours. This dose was well tolerated on an outpatient basis and achieved plasma concentrations of dexverapamil and nor-dexverapamil within the effective range for Pgp inhibition in vitro. Although dexverapamil increased the hematopoietic toxicity of EPOCH, it was mild, readily reversible, and offset by EPOCH dose reductions. Dexverapamil should be considered for further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7636539     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.8.1985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  16 in total

1.  Modulation of multidrug resistance by dexverapamil in EPOCH-refractory lymphomas.

Authors:  W H Wilson; S E Bates; A Fojo; B A Chabner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Dose-adjusted EPOCH-rituximab combined with fludarabine provides an effective bridge to reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  Rachel B Salit; Daniel H Fowler; Wyndham H Wilson; Robert M Dean; Steven Z Pavletic; Kieron Dunleavy; Frances Hakim; Terry J Fry; Seth M Steinberg; Thomas E Hughes; Jeanne Odom; Kelly Bryant; Ronald E Gress; Michael R Bishop
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Overcoming transporter-mediated multidrug resistance in cancer: failures and achievements of the last decades.

Authors:  Miglė Paškevičiūtė; Vilma Petrikaitė
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Cardiovascular effects of (R)- and (S)-verapamil and racemic verapamil in humans: a placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Dagmar Busse; Silke Templin; Gerd Mikus; Matthias Schwab; Ute Hofmann; Michel Eichelbaum; Kari T Kivistö
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Expression of chemoresistance-related genes and heat shock protein 72 in hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion of malignant melanoma: an experimental study.

Authors:  C Knorr; J O Pelz; J Göhl; W Hohenberger; T Meyer
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 6.  Novel delivery approaches for cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Ashim K Mitra; Vibhuti Agrahari; Abhirup Mandal; Kishore Cholkar; Chandramouli Natarajan; Sujay Shah; Mary Joseph; Hoang M Trinh; Ravi Vaishya; Xiaoyan Yang; Yi Hao; Varun Khurana; Dhananjay Pal
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Phase II trial of dexverapamil and epirubicin in patients with non-responsive metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M Lehnert; K Mross; J Schueller; B Thuerlimann; N Kroeger; H Kupper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Cyclosporin A as a multidrug-resistant modulator in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with teniposide.

Authors:  G Toffoli; R Sorio; M Gigante; G Corona; E Galligioni; M Boiocchi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Cancer stem cell metabolism: a potential target for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Abhijeet Deshmukh; Kedar Deshpande; Frank Arfuso; Philip Newsholme; Arun Dharmarajan
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 10.  The Role of Eukaryotic and Prokaryotic ABC Transporter Family in Failure of Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Raafat El-Awady; Ekram Saleh; Amna Hashim; Nehal Soliman; Alaa Dallah; Azza Elrasheed; Ghada Elakraa
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.