Literature DB >> 9569055

Phase II trial of dexverapamil and epirubicin in patients with non-responsive metastatic breast cancer.

M Lehnert1, K Mross, J Schueller, B Thuerlimann, N Kroeger, H Kupper.   

Abstract

Agents capable of reversing P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance have usually failed to enhance chemotherapy activity in patients with solid tumours. Based on its toxicity profile and experimental potency, dexverapamil, the R-enantiomer of verapamil, is considered to be promising for clinical use as a chemosensitizer. The purpose of this early phase II trial was to evaluate the effects of dexverapamil on epirubicin toxicity, activity and pharmacokinetics in patients with metastatic breast cancer. A two-stage design was applied. Patients first received epirubicin alone at 120 mg m(-2) i.v. over 15 min, repeated every 21 days. Patients with refractory disease continued to receive epirubicin at the same dose and schedule but supplemented with oral dexverapamil 300 mg every 6 h x 13 doses. The Gehan design was applied to the dexverapamil/epirubicin cohort of patients. Thirty-nine patients were entered on study, 25 proceeded to receive epirubicin plus dexverapamil. Dexverapamil did not increase epirubicin toxicity. The dose intensity of epirubicin was similar when used alone or with dexverapamil. In nine intrapatient comparisons, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of epirubicin was significantly reduced by dexverapamil (mean 2968 vs 1901 microg ml[-1] h[-1], P= 0.02). The mean trough plasma levels of dexverapamil and its major metabolite nor-dexverapamil were 1.2 and 1.5 microM respectively. The addition of dexverapamil to epirubicin induced partial responses in 4 of 23 patients evaluable for tumour response (17%, CI 5-39%, s.e.P 0.079). The remissions lasted 3, 8, 11 and 11+ months. These data suggest that the concept of enhancing chemotherapy activity by adding chemosensitizers may function not only in haematological malignancies but also in selected solid tumours. An increase in the AUC and toxicity of cytotoxic agents does not seem to be a prerequisite for chemosensitizers to enhance anti-tumour activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9569055      PMCID: PMC2150143          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  64 in total

1.  Modulation of multidrug resistance: at the threshold.

Authors:  B I Sikic
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Biochemistry of multidrug resistance mediated by the multidrug transporter.

Authors:  M M Gottesman; I Pastan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 23.643

3.  Phase I/II trial of cyclosporine as a chemotherapy-resistance modifier in acute leukemia.

Authors:  A F List; C Spier; J Greer; S Wolff; J Hutter; R Dorr; S Salmon; B Futscher; M Baier; W Dalton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Modulation of multidrug-resistant multiple myeloma by cyclosporin. The Leukaemia Group of the EORTC and the HOVON.

Authors:  P Sonneveld; B G Durie; H M Lokhorst; J P Marie; G Solbu; S Suciu; R Zittoun; B Löwenberg; K Nooter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Effects of verapamil on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of epirubicin.

Authors:  K Mross; K Hamm; D K Hossfeld
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Alteration of etoposide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics by cyclosporine in a phase I trial to modulate multidrug resistance.

Authors:  B L Lum; S Kaubisch; A M Yahanda; K M Adler; L Jew; M N Ehsan; N A Brophy; J Halsey; M P Gosland; B I Sikic
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Phase I trial of doxorubicin with cyclosporine as a modulator of multidrug resistance.

Authors:  N L Bartlett; B L Lum; G A Fisher; N A Brophy; M N Ehsan; J Halsey; B I Sikic
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase II trial of doxorubicin and trifluoperazine in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  G T Budd; R M Bukowski; A Lichtin; L Bauer; P Van Kirk; R Ganapathi
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Pharmacokinetic interaction between epirubicin and the multidrug resistance reverting agent D-verapamil.

Authors:  W Scheithauer; T Schenk; M Czejka
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Oral verapamil with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomised study.

Authors:  M J Millward; B M Cantwell; N C Munro; A Robinson; P A Corris; A L Harris
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  BCRP transports dipyridamole and is inhibited by calcium channel blockers.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Anshul Gupta; Honggang Wang; Lin Zhou; R Robert Vethanayagam; Jashvant D Unadkat; Qingcheng Mao
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Targeting MDR in breast and lung cancer: discriminating its potential importance from the failure of drug resistance reversal studies.

Authors:  Laleh Amiri-Kordestani; Agnes Basseville; Karen Kurdziel; Antonio Tito Fojo; Susan E Bates
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 18.500

3.  Selective and Irreversible Induction of Necroptotic Cell Death in Lung Tumorspheres by Short-Term Exposure to Verapamil in Combination with Sorafenib.

Authors:  Juan Sebastian Yakisich; Yogesh Kulkarni; Neelam Azad; Anand Krishnan V Iyer
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 4.  Cell Migration Related to MDR-Another Impediment to Effective Chemotherapy?

Authors:  Jakub Kryczka; Joanna Boncela
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.