Literature DB >> 9043030

Cyclosporin A as a multidrug-resistant modulator in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with teniposide.

G Toffoli1, R Sorio, M Gigante, G Corona, E Galligioni, M Boiocchi.   

Abstract

Patients with refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were enrolled in a phase II study with teniposide (VM26) and cyclosporin A (CSA) to investigate (1) the effect of CSA on the response rate to VM26; and (2) the effect of CSA on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of VM26. Sixteen patients initially received VM26 alone (200 mg m(-2) day(-1) i.v.). No objective responses were observed and all patients crossed over to receive at least an additional two courses (range 2-5) of VM26 plus CSA (5 mg kg(-1) 2h(-1) followed by 30 mg kg(-1) 48h(-1) i.v.). At the end of the 2-h loading dose of CSA, whole-blood CSA levels ranged from 2250 to 3830 ng ml(-1), whereas at the end of the 48-h CSA infusion, CSA ranged from 1830 to 4501 ng ml(-1). CSA significantly (P<0.01) increased the area under the curve (AUC) of VM26. The variation in the paired AUC of VM26 was 50%. Terminal half-life of VM26 was significantly (P<0.01) increased (1.72-fold) after CSA administration, whereas the systemic clearance of VM26 was decreased by 1.4-fold (P<0.01). The nadir neutrophil count after VM26 plus CSA (median 700 microl(-1), range <100 to 2860 microl(-1)) was lower than after VM26 alone (median 1900 microl(-1), range 200 to 6000 microl(-1)). Increased haematological toxicity after CSA could be explained by the increase in the VM26 AUC and by inhibition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) activity in haematopoietic precursor cells. Bilirubin concentrations in the serum were increased after VM26 plus CSA compared with VM26 alone (P<0.01). Among the 15 patients evaluable for response, one had a minor response, eight had stable disease, and six had progressive disease. In conclusion, the dose of CSA we used achieved plasma concentrations within the effective range for P-gp inhibition. CSA affected both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of VM26 in the patients, principally by increasing the plasma concentrations of the antineoplastic drug and VM26 haemopoietic toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9043030      PMCID: PMC2063346          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  27 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacology of drugs that alter multidrug resistance in cancer.

Authors:  J M Ford; W N Hait
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Expression of a multidrug-resistance gene in human tumors and tissues.

Authors:  A T Fojo; K Ueda; D J Slamon; D G Poplack; M M Gottesman; I Pastan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Quantitative determination of factors contributing to doxorubicin resistance in multidrug-resistant cells.

Authors:  G J Schuurhuis; H J Broxterman; A Cervantes; T H van Heijningen; J H de Lange; J P Baak; H M Pinedo; J Lankelma
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Biotransformation and distribution in blood of cyclosporine and its metabolites.

Authors:  G Maurer; M Lemaire
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Mechanism of cross-resistance between vincristine and daunorubicin in Ehrlich ascites tumor cells.

Authors:  T Skovsgaard
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Enhancement of etoposide-induced cytotoxicity by cyclosporin A.

Authors:  R Osieka; S Seeber; R Pannenbäcker; D Soll; P Glatte; C G Schmidt
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Inhibition of Pgp activity and cell cycle-dependent chemosensitivity to doxorubicin in the multidrug-resistant LoVo human colon cancer cell line.

Authors:  G Toffoli; G Corona; M Gigante; M Boiocchi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Enhancement by cyclosporin A of daunorubicin efficacy in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma and murine hepatoma 129.

Authors:  J Meador; P Sweet; M Stupecky; M Wetzel; S Murray; S Gupta; L Slater
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide.

Authors:  P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Reversal of drug-resistance by cyclosporin-A in a patient with acute myelocytic leukaemia.

Authors:  P Sonneveld; K Nooter
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The oral route for the administration of cytotoxic drugs: strategies to increase the efficiency and consistency of drug delivery.

Authors:  H A Bardelmeijer; O van Tellingen; J H Schellens; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.850

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.