Literature DB >> 7635540

Physiological influences on continuous finger and simultaneous intra-arterial blood pressure.

S K Lal1, R J Henderson, M Cejnar, M G Hart, S N Hunyor.   

Abstract

Because of the clinical and experimental utility of continuous finger blood pressure measurements and the need for accuracy, we tested the performance of a new hydraulic device in 22 consecutive hypertensive subjects during physiological and pharmacological interventions. Ipsilateral brachial intra-arterial pressure was monitored during rest, Valsalva's maneuver, static handgrip, and mental arithmetic and after sublingual glyceryl trinitrate. In excess of 40,000 blood pressure values were analyzed. Average bias (intra-arterial minus finger blood pressure) was 8.2 +/- 17.0 mm Hg (mean +/- SD, P = NS) for systolic and 2.8 +/- 10.4 mm Hg (P = NS) for diastolic pressure. Two-way ANOVA of biases with subject and task factors showed a subject effect (P < .001). Intersubject and intrasubject standard deviations of bias were 13.8 and 9.8 mm Hg systolic and 8.7 and 5.7 diastolic, respectively. Linear drift (millimeters of mercury per minute) of finger pressure was greater (P < .001) for systolic than diastolic pressure during static exercise and math and after glyceryl trinitrate. Coefficients of determination for blood pressure ranged from 0.4 +/- 0.3 to 0.8 +/- 0.3 during the tasks. We conclude that (1) noninvasive finger blood pressure faithfully follows intra-arterial changes but with clinically relevant offsets, (2) this technique is best suited for assessing pressure changes, (3) physiological and pharmacological interventions do not consistently affect finger pressure accuracy, (4) many reports of finger blood pressure measuring devices are based on direct readings obtained with inadequate system response characteristics, and (5) the tested instrument falls short of the standard requirements (bias < or = 5 +/- 8 mm Hg) for devices that measure intermittently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7635540     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.26.2.307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  7 in total

1.  Use of a neonatal blood pressure cuff to monitor blood pressure in the adult finger--comparison with a standard adult arm cuff.

Authors:  S Q Khan; J M Wardlaw; R Davenport; J Slattery; S Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The reproducibility of cardiac baroreceptor activity assessed non-invasively by spectral sequence techniques.

Authors:  S L Dawson; T G Robinson; J H Youde; M A James; A Martin; P Weston; R Panerai; J F Potter
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.435

3.  Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output by brachial occlusion-cuff technique: comparison with the open-circuit acetylene washin method.

Authors:  Pavol Sajgalik; Vaclav Kremen; Alex R Carlson; Vratislav Fabian; Chul-Ho Kim; Courtney Wheatley; Vaclav Gerla; John A Schirger; Thomas P Olson; Bruce D Johnson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-10-20

4.  Spontaneous blood pressure oscillations and cerebral autoregulation.

Authors:  R R Diehl; D Linden; D Lücke; P Berlit
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.435

5.  Differential vascular reactivity responses acutely following ingestion of a nitrate rich red spinach extract.

Authors:  Cody T Haun; Wesley C Kephart; Angelia M Holland; Christopher B Mobley; Anna E McCloskey; Joshua J Shake; David D Pascoe; Michael D Roberts; Jeffrey S Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Feasibility of Brachial Occlusion Technique for Beat-to-Beat Pulse Wave Analysis.

Authors:  Lukas Matera; Pavol Sajgalik; Vratislav Fabian; Yegor Mikhailov; David Zemanek; Bruce D Johnson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Characterizing sympathetic neurovascular transduction in humans.

Authors:  Can Ozan Tan; Renaud Tamisier; J W Hamner; J Andrew Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.