Literature DB >> 27765846

Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output by brachial occlusion-cuff technique: comparison with the open-circuit acetylene washin method.

Pavol Sajgalik1,2, Vaclav Kremen3,4, Alex R Carlson3, Vratislav Fabian5, Chul-Ho Kim3, Courtney Wheatley3, Vaclav Gerla4, John A Schirger3, Thomas P Olson3, Bruce D Johnson3.   

Abstract

Cardiac output (CO) assessment as a basic hemodynamic parameter has been of interest in exercise physiology, cardiology, and anesthesiology. Noninvasive techniques available are technically challenging, and thus difficult to use outside of a clinical or laboratory setting. We propose a novel method of noninvasive CO assessment using a single, upper-arm cuff. The method uses the arterial pressure pulse wave signal acquired from the brachial artery during 20-s intervals of suprasystolic occlusion. This method was evaluated in a cohort of 12 healthy individuals (age, 27.7 ± 5.4 yr, 50% men) and compared with an established method for noninvasive CO assessment, the open-circuit acetylene method (OpCirc) at rest, and during low- to moderate-intensity exercise. CO increased from rest to exercise (rest, 7.4 ± 0.8 vs. 7.2 ± 0.8; low, 9.8 ± 1.8 vs. 9.9 ± 2.0; moderate, 14.1 ± 2.8 vs. 14.8 ± 3.2 l/min) as assessed by the cuff-occlusion and OpCirc techniques, respectively. The average error of experimental technique compared with OpCirc was -0.25 ± 1.02 l/min, Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.96 (rest + exercise), and 0.21 ± 0.42 l/min with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.87 (rest only). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between methods (within 95% boundaries); the reproducibility coefficient (RPC) = 0.84 l/min with R2 = 0.75 at rest and RPC = 2 l/min with R2 = 0.92 at rest and during exercise, respectively. In comparison with an established method to quantify CO, the cuff-occlusion method provides similar measures at rest and with light to moderate exercise. Thus, we believe this method has the potential to be used as a new, noninvasive method for assessing CO during exercise.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brachial cuff; cardiac output; noninvasive; occlusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27765846      PMCID: PMC5206382          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00981.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  42 in total

Review 1.  Influence of arterial pulse and reflected waves on blood pressure and cardiac function.

Authors:  G M London; A P Guerin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Ventilation-perfusion distribution in normal subjects.

Authors:  Kenneth C Beck; Bruce D Johnson; Thomas P Olson; Theodore A Wilson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-07-05

Review 3.  ACC expert consensus document. Present use of bedside right heart catheterization in patients with cardiac disease. American College of Cardiology.

Authors:  H S Mueller; K Chatterjee; K B Davis; M A Fifer; C Franklin; M A Greenberg; A J Labovitz; P K Shah; K J Tuman; M H Weil; W S Weintraub
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Reference values of aortic pulse wave velocity in a large healthy population aged between 3 and 18 years.

Authors:  Erzsébet Valéria Hidvégi; Miklós Illyés; Béla Benczúr; Renáta M Böcskei; László Rátgéber; Zsófia Lenkey; Ferenc T Molnár; Attila Cziráki
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Stroke volume from central aortic pressure? A critical assessment of the various formulae as to their clinical value.

Authors:  P D Verdouw; J Beaune; J Roelandt; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1975 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 17.165

6.  An evaluation of a noninvasive cardiac output measurement using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing in children.

Authors:  Richard J Levy; Rosetta M Chiavacci; Susan C Nicolson; Jonathan J Rome; Richard J Lin; Mark A Helfaer; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Assessment of arterial stiffness in hypertension: comparison of oscillometric (Arteriograph), piezoelectronic (Complior) and tonometric (SphygmoCor) techniques.

Authors:  Noor A Jatoi; Azra Mahmud; Kathleen Bennett; John Feely
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Accuracy and precision of echocardiography versus right heart catheterization for the assessment of pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Michele D'Alto; Emanuele Romeo; Paola Argiento; Antonello D'Andrea; Rebecca Vanderpool; Anna Correra; Eduardo Bossone; Berardo Sarubbi; Raffaele Calabrò; Maria Giovanna Russo; Robert Naeije
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Simultaneous determination of the accuracy and precision of closed-circuit cardiac output rebreathing techniques.

Authors:  S S Jarvis; B D Levine; G K Prisk; B E Shykoff; A R Elliott; E Rosow; C G Blomqvist; J A Pawelczyk
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-06-07

Review 10.  Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Jasper Truijen; Johannes J van Lieshout; Wilbert A Wesselink; Berend E Westerhof
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.502

View more
  1 in total

1.  Feasibility of Brachial Occlusion Technique for Beat-to-Beat Pulse Wave Analysis.

Authors:  Lukas Matera; Pavol Sajgalik; Vratislav Fabian; Yegor Mikhailov; David Zemanek; Bruce D Johnson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.847

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.