Literature DB >> 7631233

A database for estimating normal spinal motion derived from noninvasive measurements.

S Gracovetsky1, N Newman, M Pawlowsky, V Lanzo, B Davey, L Robinson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A database for estimated normal spinal motion was derived using a noninvasive, high-resolution, computer-aided system, which tracks the motion of skin markers strategically placed on the spine. Forty normal subjects, selected from hundreds of possible subjects according to rigorous inclusion/exclusion criteria, were tested on the system.
OBJECTIVES: Patterns of estimated spinal motion were analyzed as a function of load, age, and sex, confirming a correlation between the movement of spinal segments and the motion of skin markers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Workers Compensation Board of Quebec funded and supervised the experiments necessary to establish a normative reference database for a high-resolution motion analysis system that permits a noninvasive assessment of spinal function. A previous study examined the correlation between the movements of the skin markers and the underlying bony structures for trunk flexion. Skin movement cannot be random and contains information characterizing both the spine and its surrounding soft tissues.
METHODS: A noninvasive dynamic imaging system was used to measure normal spinal function under free movement. A high-resolution three-dimensional camera system collected basic kinematic data from strategically placed skin markers over the lumbar spine while the activity of paraspinal muscles was being recorded with surface electromyography. The measurements were analyzed for consistent, specific patterns recognizable as normal lumbar spine skin motion and reflecting normal lumbar spine function. A comparison was made with previous radiographic studies to confirm the correlation between the motion of skin markers and lumbar spine function.
RESULTS: Lumbar skin marker motion patterns in normal subjects were consistent and varied little with load; gender had no effect except in the initial phase of a movement. There was less mobility but similar coordination in older subjects. No inconsistencies with previous radiologic investigations were found for sagittal and lateral plane movement.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7631233     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

Review 1.  Working postures: a literature review.

Authors:  Edgar Ramos Vieira; Shrawan Kumar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

2.  Three-dimensional relation of skin markers to lumbar vertebrae of healthy subjects in different postures measured by open MRI.

Authors:  Falk Mörl; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Trunk posture monitoring with inertial sensors.

Authors:  Wai Yin Wong; Man Sang Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Individual characteristics of reliable lumbar coupling motions.

Authors:  Woo-Suck Yun; Hyunho Kim; Ji Hoon Ahn; Young-Bae Park; Young-Jae Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A 3D motion analysis study comparing the effectiveness of cervical spine orthoses at restricting spinal motion through physiological ranges.

Authors:  Nicholas Rhys Evans; Georgina Hooper; Rachel Edwards; Gemma Whatling; Valerie Sparkes; Cathy Holt; Sashin Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Investigation of coupled bending of the lumbar spine during dynamic axial rotation of the body.

Authors:  Jae-Hyuk Shin; Shaobai Wang; Qi Yao; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Biomechanics of intervertebral disk degeneration.

Authors:  Nozomu Inoue; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Lumbopelvic rhythm in the sagittal plane: A review of the effects of participants and task characteristics.

Authors:  Milad Vazirian; Linda R Van Dillen; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  Int Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-11-28

9.  Intervertebral disc degeneration: biological and biomechanical factors.

Authors:  Howard S An; Koichi Masuda; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.601

10.  Psychometric properties of chronic low back pain diagnostic classification systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed Omar Abdelnaeem; Aliaa Rehan Youssef; Nesreen Fawzy Mahmoud; Nadia Abdalazeem Fayaz; Robert Vining
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.