Literature DB >> 7630930

Analogs of alkyllysophospholipids: chemistry, effects on the molecular level and their consequences for normal and malignant cells.

H Brachwitz1, C Vollgraf.   

Abstract

In the search for new approaches to cancer therapy, the first alkyllysophospholipid (ALP) analogs were designed and studied about two decades ago, either as potential immunomodulators or as antimetabolites of phospholipid metabolism. In the meantime, it has been demonstrated that they really act in this way. However, their special importance is based on the fact that, in addition, they interfere with key events of signal transduction, such as hormone (or cytokine)-receptor binding or processing, protein kinase C or phospholipase C function and phosphatidylinositol and calcium metabolism. There are no strict structural requirements for their activity. Differences in the cellular uptake or the state of cellular differentiation seem to be mainly responsible for higher or lower sensitivities of cells towards ALP analogs. Consequences of the molecular effects mentioned on the cellular level are cytostasis, induction of differentiation (while in contrast the effects of known inducers of differentiation such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate are inhibited, probably as a consequence of protein kinase C inhibition) and loss of invasive properties. Already in sublytic concentrations, alterations in the membrane structure were observed, and lysis may begin at concentrations not much higher than those causing the other effects described. Few ALP analogs have already entered clinical studies or are in clinical use. ALP analogs are the only antineoplastic agents that do not act directly on the formation and function of the cellular replication machinery. Therefore, their effects are independent of the proliferative state of the target cells. Because of their interference with cellular regulatory events, including those failing in cancer cells, ALP analogs, beyond their clinical importance, are interesting model compounds for the development of new, more selective drugs for cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7630930     DOI: 10.1016/0163-7258(95)00001-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0163-7258            Impact factor:   12.310


  13 in total

Review 1.  Synthesis of nucleoside phosphate and phosphonate prodrugs.

Authors:  Ugo Pradere; Ethel C Garnier-Amblard; Steven J Coats; Franck Amblard; Raymond F Schinazi
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Tumor and normal tissue pharmacokinetics of perifosine, an oral anti-cancer alkylphospholipid.

Authors:  Stefan R Vink; Jan H M Schellens; Wim J van Blitterswijk; Marcel Verheij
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Growth inhibitory effects of liposome-associated 1-O-octadecyl-2-O-methyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine.

Authors:  A C Peters; I Ahmad; A S Janoff; M Y Pushkareva; E Mayhew
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.880

Review 4.  Enzyme-triggered nanomedicine: drug release strategies in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Thomas L Andresen; David H Thompson; Thomas Kaasgaard
Journal:  Mol Membr Biol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.857

5.  In vitro bactericidal activity of the antiprotozoal drug miltefosine against Streptococcus pneumoniae and other pathogenic streptococci.

Authors:  Daniel Llull; Luis Rivas; Ernesto García
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Lysophospholipids in the Mediterranean sponge Oscarella tuberculata: seasonal variability and putative biological role.

Authors:  Julijana Ivanisevic; Thierry Pérez; Alexander V Ereskovsky; Gilles Barnathan; Olivier P Thomas
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Testing the hypothesis that amphiphilic antineoplastic lipid analogues act through reduction of membrane curvature elastic stress.

Authors:  Marcus Dymond; George Attard; Anthony D Postle
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Antileishmanial structure-activity relationships of synthetic phospholipids: in vitro and in vivo activities of selected derivatives.

Authors:  Karin Seifert; Andreas Lemke; Simon L Croft; Oliver Kayser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Bioactivity of miltefosine against aquatic stages of Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma haematobium and their snail hosts, supported by scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  Maha M Eissa; Samia El Bardicy; Menerva Tadros
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  MDR1 causes resistance to the antitumour drug miltefosine.

Authors:  M Rybczynska; R Liu; P Lu; F J Sharom; E Steinfels; A D Pietro; M Spitaler; H Grunicke; J Hofmann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-05-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.