Literature DB >> 7628028

Detection of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia--a comparison among electrocardiographic, myocardial metabolic, and haemodynamic measurements in patients with reduced ventricular function.

R I Hall1, N O'Regan, M Gardner.   

Abstract

This study determined the sensitivity and specificity of haemodynamic and ECG monitors to detect the development of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia utilizing myocardial lactate production as the standard. In 29 patients with reduced ejection fraction (0.27-0.50) undergoing coronary artery revascularization, measurements were made at the awake, post-induction, post-intubation, first skin incision, post-sternotomy, pre-protamine, immediately post-cardiopulmonary bypass, and skin suture intervals. At each interval, measurement of a haemodynamic profile (including pulmonary artery occlusion (PAOP) and central venous (CVP) pressures, heart rate, and pressure rate quotient); myocardial lactate extraction and flux; changes in ST segments in ECG leads, V5 and II utilizing a Siemens 1280 intraoperative monitor, and a Marquette 8500 Holter monitor utilizing leads V5, V2, and AVF were made. "Ischaemia" was considered to be present when myocardial lactate production (MLP) occurred, PAOP or CVP increased by 5 mmHg above the baseline value, the pressure rate quotient was < 1, or ST segment deviation (> 1 mm) occurred in any lead for > 1 min. Variables positive when MLP was positive were the pressure rate quotient (sensitivity 32.8%, specificity 71.9%), CVP (sensitivity 10.9%, specificity 92.6%), and PAOP (sensitivity 1.6%, specificity 99.2%). Holter monitoring had a 100% positive predictive value but poor sensitivity (1.6%). The ECG (Lead V5 + II) measures of ischaemia were insensitive (17.5%) and relatively non-specific (87.7%). We conclude that, in this patient group and using myocardial lactate production as the standard, the pressure rate quotient, elevations in CVP or PAOP, or ST segment changes are insensitive measures of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7628028     DOI: 10.1007/bf03011686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  28 in total

1.  Pressure-rate quotient in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  C W Buffington
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Comparison of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic, mechanical, and metabolic indicators of intraoperative myocardial ischemia in vascular surgical patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S Häggmark; P Hohner; M Ostman; A Friedman; G Diamond; E Lowenstein; S Reiz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Prognostic importance of postbypass regional wall-motion abnormalities in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. SPI Research Group.

Authors:  J M Leung; B O'Kelly; W S Browner; J Tubau; M Hollenberg; D T Mangano
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Qualitative evaluation of coronary flow during anesthetic induction using thallium-201 perfusion scans.

Authors:  B Kleinman; R E Henkin; S N Glisson; A A el-Etr; M Bakhos; H J Sullivan; A Montoya; R Pifarre
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Coronary sinus lactate measurements in assessment of myocardial ischemia. Comparison with changes in lactate-pyruvate and beta-hydroxybutyrate-acetoacetate ratios and with release of hydrogen, phosphate and potassium ions from the heart.

Authors:  L H Opie; P Owen; M Thomas; R Samson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1973-09-07       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Artefactual ST segment abnormalities due to electrocardiograph design.

Authors:  D I Tayler; R Vincent
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-08

7.  Does perioperative myocardial ischemia lead to postoperative myocardial infarction?

Authors:  S Slogoff; A S Keats
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Do changes in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure adequately reflect myocardial ischemia during anesthesia? A correlative preoperative hemodynamic, electrocardiographic, and transesophageal echocardiographic study.

Authors:  M E van Daele; G R Sutherland; M M Mitchell; A G Fraser; O Prakash; E N Rulf; J R Roelandt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Perioperative myocardial ischemia: importance of the preoperative ischemic pattern.

Authors:  A A Knight; M Hollenberg; M J London; J Tubau; E Verrier; W Browner; D T Mangano
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Effect of angina on the left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relationship.

Authors:  T Mann; B R Brodie; W Grossman; L P McLaurin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative automated ST segment analysis: a reliable 'black box'?

Authors:  H Yang
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  On line ST-segment analysis for detection of myocardial ischaemia during and after coronary revascularization.

Authors:  D M Ansley; J P O'Connor; P M Merrick; D R Ricci; J Dolman; P Kapnoudhis
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.063

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.